Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
22 02 100 • KG LU 22 02 100 Generato dall'IA

Joint Divorce Petition Non-Confirmation Cost Allocation

Numero d'incarto 22 02 100
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Lucerna (CH-LU)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Parzialmente accolto (Partially Allowed)
Spese processuali ripartite
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

In a joint divorce petition where one spouse subsequently failed to confirm their intent to divorce after the statutory reflection period, the court ruled that this non-confirmation, being an exercise of a right under divorce law, should not result in the defaulting spouse bearing the entire procedural costs; accordingly, the court overturned the lower court's decision that assigned all costs to the non-confirming spouse, reasoning that in such non-adversarial proceedings based on mutual petition, costs should generally be split equally between both parties, and party costs should be offset, unless other specific circumstances warrant a different allocation under procedural law.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

§§ 119 Abs. 1 und 120 Abs. 1 ZPO. Einem Ehegatten, der nach Ablauf der zweimonatigen Bedenkzeit gemäss Art. 111 Abs. 2 ZGB seinen Scheidungswillen nicht bestätigt, dürfen allein deswegen keine (Kosten-)Nachteile erwachsen. Diesfalls sind die Verfahrenskosten den Ehegatten grundsätzlich hälftig zu überbinden. | Zivilprozessrecht

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
causa di divorzio nullità procedurale coniuge spese di procedura contumacia di una parte base legale

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 111 Abs. 2 ZGB
Einem Ehegatten, der nach Ablauf der zweimonatigen Bedenkzeit gemäss Art. 111 Abs. 2 ZGB seinen Scheidungswillen nicht bestätigt, dürfen allein deswegen keine (Kosten-)Nachteile erwachsen.
Art. 111 ZGB
Einem Ehegatten, der nach Ablauf der zweimonatigen Bedenkzeit gemäss Art. 111 Abs.
Art. 112 ZGB
Art. 115 ZGB
Art. 111 oder
Einem Ehegatten, der nach Ablauf der zweimonatigen Bedenkzeit gemäss Art. 111 Abs.
§§ 119 Abs. 1 und 120 Abs. 1 ZPO
Cited in the operative part to determine that the applicant was not liable for all costs due to the non-confirmation of the divorce will.
§ 266 lit. b ZPO
Cited as the basis for finding that the previous cost allocation suffered from a ground for nullity.
§ 121 ZPO
Cited as a potential basis for a unilateral cost allocation, which the court found inapplicable in this case.
Generato dall'IA
22 00 27
Divorce Cost Allocation Overturned Based on Reconciliation Protocol Interpretation
22 00 12
Divorce Costs Allocation and Provisional Legal Aid
3C 18 16
Security for Costs in Divorce Judgment Amendment Proceedings
22 01 104
Marital Protection Proceedings: Cost Allocation Based on Family Law Principles Over Partial Success
22 01 115
Divorce Hearing Counsel Exclusion in Joint Petition

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§§ 119 Abs. 1 und 120 Abs. 1 ZPO

Cited in the operative part to determine that the applicant was not liable for all costs due to the non-confirmation of the divorce will.

§ 266 lit. b ZPO

Cited as the basis for finding that the previous cost allocation suffered from a ground for nullity.

§ 121 ZPO

Cited as a potential basis for a unilateral cost allocation, which the court found inapplicable in this case.

§ 64 ZPO

Cited in the operative part regarding the granting of legal aid (unentgeltliche Rechtspflege) when distributing the court costs.

§ 119 Abs. 1 ZPO

Cited in the reasoning context of the decision regarding the general rule for imposing costs on the losing party.

§ 120 Abs. 1 ZPO

Cited in the reasoning context of the decision regarding imposing costs for unnecessarily caused expenses.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · II. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · Zivilprozessrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 08.01.2003

Fallnummer: · 22 02 100

LGVE: · 2003 I Nr. 38

Leitsatz: · §§ 119 Abs. 1 und 120 Abs. 1 ZPO. Einem Ehegatten, der nach Ablauf der zweimonatigen Bedenkzeit gemäss Art. 111 Abs. 2 ZGB seinen Scheidungswillen nicht bestätigt, dürfen allein deswegen keine (Kosten-)Nachteile erwachsen. Diesfalls sind die Verfahrenskosten den Ehegatten grundsätzlich hälftig zu überbinden.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.