Landlord Liability for Building Insurance Premiums as Ancillary Costs
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe appellate court upheld the lower court's decision that a landlord could not charge a tenant for the building insurance premium as part of ancillary costs, reasoning that the statutory definition of ancillary costs under the Code of Obligations is mandatory, and costs not related to the tenant's use of the rented property, such as building insurance which falls under burdens and public charges (Art. 256b OR), cannot be validly stipulated as a divisible ancillary cost in the lease agreement; if the landlord intended to pass these costs to the tenant, they should have been included in the rent calculation from the outset.
Regesto Legislator
UfficialeArt. 256b OR; Art. 257a f. OR. Ein Mietvertrag kann nicht gültig vorsehen, dass eine Gebäudeversicherungsprämie als Nebenkosten zulasten der Mieter geht. | OR (Obligationenrecht)
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IAGiurisprudenza citata
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IACited as the legal basis classifying building insurance premiums under burdens and public charges, which cannot be validly passed on as ancillary costs.
Cited as the legal basis establishing the mandatory nature of the definition of ancillary costs, preventing the inclusion of the building insurance premium.
Testo completo
Rechtsprechung Luzern
Instanz: · Obergericht
Abteilung: · 1. Abteilung
Rechtsgebiet: · OR (Obligationenrecht)
Entscheiddatum: · 15.06.2011
Fallnummer: · 1C 11 9
LGVE: · 2011 I Nr. 20
Leitsatz: · Art. 256b OR; Art. 257a f. OR. Ein Mietvertrag kann nicht gültig vorsehen, dass eine Gebäudeversicherungsprämie als Nebenkosten zulasten der Mieter geht.
Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.