Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
11 09 105 • KG LU 11 09 105 Generato dall'IA

Interpretation of Divorce Agreement Cost-Sharing Clause

Numero d'incarto 11 09 105
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Lucerna (CH-LU)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The court was asked to interpret a clause in a judicially approved divorce agreement where one party agreed to contribute half the moving and cleaning costs, up to a maximum of CHF 5,000. The court reasoned that a judicially approved divorce convention becomes an integral part of the judgment, and its interpretation, when it mandates a non-specified sum, should follow the rules for contract interpretation under Article 18 of the Code of Obligations, focusing on the objective meaning based on good faith, as the subjective intent was not proven. The court concluded that the phrasing "as a gesture of goodwill" and "without admission of legal obligation" did not negate the clear commitment to a half-share, especially given the explicit cost cap, thus affirming the lower court's decision to order payment of the claimed CHF 1,092.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 18 OR, Art. 18 Abs. 1 OR, Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Interpretation of Divorce Agreement Cost-Sharing Clause: The court reasoned that a judicially approved divorce convention becomes an integral part of the judgment, and its interpretation, when it mandates a non-specified sum, should follow the rules for contract interpretation under Article 18 of the Code of Obligations, focusing on the objective meaning based on good faith, as the subjective intent was not proven. The court concluded that the phrasing "as a gesture of goodwill" and "without admission of legal obligation" did not negate the clear commitment to a half-share, especially given the explicit cost cap, thus affirming the lower court's decision to order payment of the claimed CHF 1,092.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
interpretazione del contratto convenzione sulle conseguenze accessorie del divorzio obbligo di lealtà mezzo di pagamento partecipazione alle spese dell'assicurato diritto matrimoniale

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 18 OR
The court analogously applied the interpretation rules of Art. 18 OR to the divorce agreement incorporated into the judgment as the basis for determining the actual obligation.
Art. 18 Abs. 1 OR
9 Leitsatz: · Art. 18 OR.
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision would typically govern the allocation of costs, although the specific dispositive orders imposing costs are missing from the provided text excerpt.

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
BGE 119 II 300
BGE 129 III 630
BGE 132 III 27
Generato dall'IA
22 06 80
Marital Contract Deemed Disguised Divorce Settlement Requiring Judicial Approval
22 00 27
Divorce Cost Allocation Overturned Based on Reconciliation Protocol Interpretation
22 02 100
Joint Divorce Petition Non-Confirmation Cost Allocation
3B 16 29
Appellate Court Upholds Divorce Based on Intent to Dissolve Legal Marriage Despite Financial Motivation
11 08 130
Suretyship Validity and Contractual Interpretation

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 18 OR

The court analogously applied the interpretation rules of Art. 18 OR to the divorce agreement incorporated into the judgment as the basis for determining the actual obligation.

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision would typically govern the allocation of costs, although the specific dispositive orders imposing costs are missing from the provided text excerpt.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht Abteilung: · I. Kammer Rechtsgebiet: · OR (Obligationenrecht) Entscheiddatum: · 16.09.2009 Fallnummer: · 11 09 105 LGVE: · 2009 I Nr. 9 Leitsatz: · Art. 18 OR. Auslegung einer gerichtlich genehmigten Scheidungsvereinbarung. Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.