Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
11 07 88 • KG LU 11 07 88 Generato dall'IA

Security Deposit for Eviction Challenge Permissible Despite Free Initial Conciliation

Numero d'incarto 11 07 88
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Lucerna (CH-LU)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellate court reviewed a direct challenge via *Nichtigkeitsbeschwerde* against a court order demanding a security deposit for court costs, noting that such an order, if ignored, results in a non-remediable disadvantage because the tenant's challenge to an eviction notice would be dismissed. The court reasoned that while rent termination challenges before the conciliation authority are free of charge under the relevant Federal Code, when the authority competent for eviction also rules on the effect of the termination (as per the relevant provision), the procedure becomes subject to court fees, distinguishing it from the free conciliation procedure; therefore, demanding a security deposit from the parties challenging the eviction (who functionally act as plaintiffs regarding the termination challenge) was permissible and did not violate procedural or substantive law.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

§§ 123 Abs. 1 und 265 Abs. 2 ZPO; Art. 274d Abs. 2 und 274g OR. Die mit Säumnisfolgen versehene Aufforderung zur Leistung eines Gerichtskostenvorschusses kann mit Nichtigkeitsbeschwerde angefochten werden. Entscheidet die für die Ausweisung zuständige Behörde auch über die Wirkung der Kündigung, ist dieses Verfahren - im Gegensatz zu den Verfahren bei der Schlichtungsbehörde nach Art. 274d Abs. 2 OR - kostenpflichtig. | Zivilprozessrecht

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
sfratto del conduttore esperimento di conciliazione pigione iniziale coinquilino prestazione del deposito cauzionale prestazione di garanzia

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 274d Abs. 2 OR
Cited in the context of distinguishing the cost-free nature of the conciliation procedure from the court procedure.
Art. 274g OR
Cited to support the reasoning that the court had jurisdiction to decide on the termination of the lease when addressing the eviction.
Art. 273 Abs. 1 OR
Art. 274g Abs. 1 OR
Art. 274d Abs. 3 OR
§ 265 Abs. 2 ZPO
Cited as a basis for finding the appeal admissible because the order imposing the cost deposit created an irreparable disadvantage.
§ 123 Abs. 1 ZPO
Cited as the basis for the argument that requesting a cost deposit from the defendants was not a violation, as they held the claimant's position regarding the termination challenge.

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
BGE 128 V 199
Swiss Federal Insurance Court Confirms Appealability of Advance on Costs Order in Foreign Resident Contribution Case
4P.70/2001
Swiss Federal Supreme Court Ruling on Expert Cost Advancement and Sanctions in Patent Infringement Case
Generato dall'IA
OG 1992 34
Settlement Validity Challenge Does Not Halt Eviction Proceedings
11 05 50
Appeal Concerning Suspension of Tenancy Eviction Proceedings
11 08 171
Landlord Eviction Upheld Despite Tenant Challenges to Procedure and Enforcement
OG 1992 10
Case Concerning Security Deposit Sufficiency for Provisional Property Register Entry
1C 11 21
Summary Eviction Appeal Permissibility and Procedural Omissions

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 265 Abs. 2 ZPO

Cited as a basis for finding the appeal admissible because the order imposing the cost deposit created an irreparable disadvantage.

Art. 274g OR

Cited to support the reasoning that the court had jurisdiction to decide on the termination of the lease when addressing the eviction.

Art. 274d Abs. 2 OR

Cited in the context of distinguishing the cost-free nature of the conciliation procedure from the court procedure.

§ 123 Abs. 1 ZPO

Cited as the basis for the argument that requesting a cost deposit from the defendants was not a violation, as they held the claimant's position regarding the termination challenge.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · I. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · Zivilprozessrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 20.08.2007

Fallnummer: · 11 07 88

LGVE: · 2007 I Nr. 32

Leitsatz: · §§ 123 Abs. 1 und 265 Abs. 2 ZPO; Art. 274d Abs. 2 und 274g OR. Die mit Säumnisfolgen versehene Aufforderung zur Leistung eines Gerichtskostenvorschusses kann mit Nichtigkeitsbeschwerde angefochten werden. Entscheidet die für die Ausweisung zuständige Behörde auch über die Wirkung der Kündigung, ist dieses Verfahren - im Gegensatz zu den Verfahren bei der Schlichtungsbehörde nach Art. 274d Abs. 2 OR - kostenpflichtig.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.