Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
11 07 13 • KG LU 11 07 13 Generato dall'IA

Summary Termination Validity Based on Insufficient Warning

Numero d'incarto 11 07 13
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Lucerna (CH-LU)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellate court upheld the lower court's decision not to recognize a summary termination for cause, ruling that prior warnings issued to the employee for unexcused absences and lateness lacked the requisite warning function for immediate dismissal under Art. 337 OR. The court reasoned that while the warnings served to reprimand the behavior, they failed to clearly communicate that any future misconduct would result in immediate termination rather than just ordinary termination or that the employee needed to improve within a specific timeframe to avoid such a drastic consequence, noting that a general contractual warning does not substitute for a specific, individualized warning clearly indicating the risk of summary dismissal.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

Art. 337 OR. Die Abmahnung hat Rüge- und Warnfunktion. Eine generelle Warnung im Arbeitsvertrag ersetzt die im Einzelfall auszusprechende Warnung nicht. Bedeutung einer Mahnung, der Arbeitnehmer müsse sich binnen einer gewissen Frist bessern. | OR (Obligationenrecht)

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
licenziamento in tronco ammonizione disdetta ingiustificata scadenza di disdetta decisione motivata sentenze sulla validità di un atto

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 337 OR
Leitsatz: · Art. 337 OR.
Art. 337 Abs. 1 OR
Leitsatz: · Art. 337 OR.
Art. 337 Abs. 2 OR
Leitsatz: · Art. 337 OR.
Art. 337 Abs. 3 OR
Leitsatz: · Art. 337 OR.

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
BGE 127 III 153
Employee Dismissal Over Refusal of Last-Minute Order Unjustified Despite Prior Warning
4C.370/2004
Cabinetmaker Apprentice Unjust Termination Appeal
4C.248/2000
Unjustified Immediate Dismissal of Sales Employee Upheld
4C.187/2004
Consultant's Summary Dismissal Overtoned Due to Lack of Immediate Action and Specific Warning on Decorum
Generato dall'IA
11 04 70
Termination Following Warning Period Insufficiently Long
V 05 96
Employment Termination During Probation Over Summary Dismissal and Procedural Violation
7H 13 99
Employee Termination Upheld for Undisclosed Excessive Outside Employment
V 04 14 1
Personnel Dismissal: Written Warning and Right to be Heard Requirements
V 99 225
Employee Termination Without Prior Due Process Hearing

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · I. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · OR (Obligationenrecht)

Entscheiddatum: · 27.04.2007

Fallnummer: · 11 07 13

LGVE: · 2007 I Nr. 24

Leitsatz: · Art. 337 OR. Die Abmahnung hat Rüge- und Warnfunktion. Eine generelle Warnung im Arbeitsvertrag ersetzt die im Einzelfall auszusprechende Warnung nicht. Bedeutung einer Mahnung, der Arbeitnehmer müsse sich binnen einer gewissen Frist bessern.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.