Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
11 07 125 • KG LU 11 07 125 Generato dall'IA

Property Use Agreement Termination and Conciliation Hearing Attendance

Numero d'incarto 11 07 125
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Lucerna (CH-LU)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Spese processuali a carico del ricorrente / reclamante

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

When parties to a dispute concerning a property use agreement appeared before a conciliation authority regarding the termination of the agreement and the refusal to sign a building application, and the defendants failed to appear at the conciliation hearing after raising a defense of the authority's lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, the court held that raising an objection of incompetence does not exempt parties from the procedural obligation to attend the conciliation hearing, as the resulting cost decision is merely a sanction for non-compliance with a procedural duty and not a final ruling on the merits or the question of subject-matter jurisdiction, which was not yet ripe for decision at that preliminary stage.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

Art. 30 Abs. 1 BV; §§ 17 und 30 GSMP. Die Einrede der Unzuständigkeit entbindet die Parteien nicht vor dem Erscheinen zur Einigungsverhandlung. | Zivilprozessrecht

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
udienza di conciliazione oggetto della lite convenzione di risoluzione decisione pregiudiziale incompetenza per materia censure procedurali

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 30 Abs. 1 BV
Cited in the headline and in the reasoning to confirm that the right to the constitutional judge was not violated regarding the costs decision.
Art. 29 BV
Art. 273 OR
§ 17 GSMP
Cited to justify the imposition of procedure costs when a party fails to appear at the conciliation hearing.
§ 30 GSMP
Cited in conjunction with § 17 GSMP to characterize the costs decision as not being a decision on the merits or procedural prerequisites.
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 30 Abs. 1 BV

Cited in the headline and in the reasoning to confirm that the right to the constitutional judge was not violated regarding the costs decision.

§ 17 GSMP

Cited to justify the imposition of procedure costs when a party fails to appear at the conciliation hearing.

§ 30 GSMP

Cited in conjunction with § 17 GSMP to characterize the costs decision as not being a decision on the merits or procedural prerequisites.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · I. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · Zivilprozessrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 27.11.2007

Fallnummer: · 11 07 125

LGVE: · 2008 I Nr. 25

Leitsatz: · Art. 30 Abs. 1 BV; §§ 17 und 30 GSMP. Die Einrede der Unzuständigkeit entbindet die Parteien nicht vor dem Erscheinen zur Einigungsverhandlung.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.