Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
11 02 71 • KG LU 11 02 71 Generato dall'IA

Prohibition on Altering Legal Claims on Appeal

Numero d'incarto 11 02 71
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Lucerna (CH-LU)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The court determined that the prohibition on altering legal claims in the second instance, as stipulated by the relevant procedural code, is absolute and is not negated by reserving the right to bring a subsequent claim, which would only permit the assertion of different claims in a separate future proceeding. Consequently, the court ruled that it could not consider the appeal where the appellant sought new or increased claims in the grounds of appeal, although a reduction of the legal claims remains permissible at any stage.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 98 Abs. 2 ZPO, § 98 Abs. 3 ZPO; Prohibition on Altering Legal Claims on Appeal: Consequently, the court ruled that it could not consider the appeal where the appellant sought new or increased claims in the grounds of appeal, although a reduction of the legal claims remains permissible at any stage.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
modificazione delle conclusioni diritti procedurali diritto di rimanere credito futuro divieto dell'arbitrio impugnabilità della decisione di rinvio

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 98 Abs. 2 ZPO
Cited as the rule prohibiting the change of claims in the second instance, leading to the non-admission of the appeal concerning new or increased claims.
§ 98 Abs. 3 ZPO
Cited to distinguish that a restriction of the claims is always possible, even in the second instance.
Generato dall'IA
11 97 23 242
Appeal on Procedural Prohibition of New Evidence in Nullity Proceedings
11 03 23
Claim Value Reduction in Appeal Does Not Alter Procedural Basis
22 04 104
Admissibility of New Facts in Appeal Procedure
11 03 2
Claim and Request Amendments Under $\S 98$ Code of Civil Procedure
21 06 100 3
Appeal Conviction Reversal and Prohibition on Worsening Appellant's Position

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 98 Abs. 2 ZPO

Cited as the rule prohibiting the change of claims in the second instance, leading to the non-admission of the appeal concerning new or increased claims.

§ 98 Abs. 3 ZPO

Cited to distinguish that a restriction of the claims is always possible, even in the second instance.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · I. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · Zivilprozessrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 26.06.2003

Fallnummer: · 11 02 71

LGVE: · 2003 I Nr. 34

Leitsatz: · § 98 Abs. 2 ZPO. Der Vorbehalt eines Nachklagerechts hebt das Klageänderungsverbot vor zweiter Instanz nicht auf.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.