Challenge to Witness Testimony Records in Appeal Proceedings

The defendant challenged the record of witness testimonies from the first instance proceedings, alleging the record was repeatedly corrected and summarized by the instructing judge, but the court dismissed this critique as unsubstantiated, noting the witnesses confirmed the accuracy of the signed protocols. The court reasoned that under procedural law, any request to correct the protocol must be submitted to the judge in the initial proceedings; consequently, if no such correction was requested at that stage, challenging the protocol during appeal proceedings is barred.