155.21
VRPGLPJALGA
CH-BE
CH-BE
Art. 97 Loi sur la procédure et la juridiction administratives (LPJA) - Demande de révision
Moyens de droit extraordinaires et moyens non juridictionnels - Révision
Art. 97 Loi sur la procédure et la juridiction administratives (LPJA) · Demande de révision
1. La demande de révision sera adressée à l'autorité de justice administrative dont la décision sur recours ou le jugement devraient être révisés.
2. La demande indiquera en quoi consistent la modification de la décision sur recours ou du jugement et, le cas échéant, la restitution demandées.
3. La demande de révision, tout en respectant par analogie les conditions de forme fixées à l'article 32, doit en outre indiquer le motif de révision invoqué et justifier qu'il a été formulé en temps utile.
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (7)
200 2017 947 · be (Art. 97 Abs. 1 VRPG)
Claimant's Untimely Request for Revision of Accident Insurance Denial Based on Allegedly Non-Existent Medical Documentation
Cited alongside federal law to establish the court's jurisdiction to rule on the revision request.
200 2025 465 · be (Art. 97 Abs. 1-3 VRPG)
Dismissal of Revision Request for Procedural Deficiencies
The court decided not to proceed with the revision request because it did not meet the formal requirements outlined in these articles.
100 2024 219 · be (Art. 97 Abs. 1 VRPG)
Revision Denied: Plot Division Known During Original Proceedings
Cited in relation to which body assesses the appeal (though the result is reached under Art. 95 VRPG).
100 2024 219 · be (Art. 97 Abs. 1 VRPG)
Revision Denied: Plot Division Known During Original Proceedings
Cited in the reasoning section discussing the jurisdiction for treating a revision request, though the final disposition mostly relies on the outcome decided under subsequent provisions.
200 2021 697 · be (Art. 97 VRPG)
Pension Revision Request Dismissed for Lack of New, Relevant Facts
Applied because the non-admittance of the appeal was based on unfulfilled formal requirements for the revision request.
200 2016 986 · be (art. 97 al. 1 LPJA)
Insurance Benefit Revision Denial Based on Untimely Medical Evidence
This article was cited in the reasoning (c. 2.3) for declaring the revision request inadmissible, echoing the substantive rejection grounded in the lack of new facts/evidence.
200 2013 458 · be (Art. 97 Abs. 3 VRPG)
Healthcare Provider's Attempt to Revise Exclusion from Mandatory Insurance Fails Due to Untimely and Insufficient New Evidence
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the requirement to substantiate the grounds for revision.