155.21
VRPGLPJALGA
CH-BE
CH-BE
Art. 94 Loi sur la procédure et la juridiction administratives (LPJA) - Procédure
Procédure d'action - Appel
Art. 94 Loi sur la procédure et la juridiction administratives (LPJA) · Procédure
1. L'appel doit être interjeté par écrit devant le Tribunal administratif dans les 30 jours à compter de la notification du jugement et respecter les conditions de forme fixées à l'article 32.
2. ...
3. Au surplus, les articles 84a, 91 et 92 s’appliquent par analogie.
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (11)
100 2020 424 · be (Art. 94 Abs. 1 i.V.m. Art. 32 Abs. 2 VRPG)
Appeal Concerning Remuneration for External Audit Under Public-Law Contract
Cited in E. 1.6 regarding the formal requirements for the grounds of appeal, leading to the decision not to enter into the sub-subsidiary motion (Subeventualbegehren).
100 2019 252 · be (Art. 94 Abs. 1 VRPG)
Municipality Liability for Road Runoff Damage to Potato Field
Cited to confirm that formal and time requirements for the appeal were met.
100 2013 62 · be (Art. 94 Abs. 1 VRPG)
Farmer's Claim for Real Estate Substitution Over Land Expropriation Denied
Cited together with Art. 36 EntG and Art. 32 VRPG regarding the admissibility of the appeal.
100 2024 82 · be (Art. 94 Abs. 1 VRPG)
Community Road Project Early Possession Dispute
Cited in the reasoning related to checking the admissibility criteria (timeliness) of the appeal.
100 2019 398 · be (Art. 94 Abs. 1 VRPG)
Municipality's Expropriation Right for Joint University/Urban Development Project
Cited in the reasoning regarding compliance with form and deadlines for filing the appeal.
100 2019 240 · be (Art. 94 Abs. 1 VRPG)
Early Possession for University Campus Upheld Despite Owner Opposition
Cited as part of the procedural basis ensuring the appeal was filed in time.
100 2018 380 · be (Art. 94 Abs. 1 VRPG)
Municipality v. Property Owner (Early Possession for University Campus)
Cited in reasoning for the admissibility and timeliness of the appeal.
100 2016 204 · be (Art. 94 Abs. 1 i.V.m. Art. 32 VRPG)
Municipality v. Company: Wastewater Fee Reduction Validity
Used to confirm the admissibility of the appeal filed by A.________ AG (procedural basis for entering examination of Appeal 100.2016.204).
100 2013 208 · be (Art. 94 Abs. 1 VRPG)
Municipality v. Landowner (Breach of Public-Law Agreement on Land Transfer)
Cited as the basis for admitting the appeal regarding the intermediate decision.
100 2013 35 · be (Art. 94 Abs. 1 VRPG)
Cantonal Administrative Court Upholds Expropriation Compensation for Road Expansion
Cited in the reasoning about appeal admissibility, but not in the dispositive.
100 2013 35 · be (Art. 94 Abs. 1 VRPG)
Cantonal Administrative Court Upholds Expropriation Compensation for Road Expansion
Cited in the reasoning regarding the timing of the appeal, but not explicitly in the dispositive.