Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
155.21 VRPGLPJALGA CH-BE

Art. 68 Loi sur la procédure et la juridiction administratives (LPJA) - Effet suspensif

Procédure de recours interne à l’administration - Procédure de recours
Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (140 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 68 Loi sur la procédure et la juridiction administratives (LPJA) · Effet suspensif

1. Le recours a effet suspensif à moins que la législation n'en dispose autrement.

2. L'autorité qui rend la décision peut, pour de justes motifs, ordonner qu'un recours éventuel n'ait pas d'effet suspensif.

3. En tant que décision incidente, une telle décision est séparément susceptible de recours si elle peut causer un préjudice irréparable; ce recours n’a pas d’effet suspensif.

4. Pendant la litispendance d'une procédure de recours, l'autorité chargée de l'instruction peut, d'office ou sur requête, retirer ou rétablir pour de justes motifs l'effet suspensif.

5. Sont notamment réputés justes motifs

a) un intérêt public exigeant l'exécution immédiate d'une décision imposant un devoir ou

b) un intérêt privé à ce qu'une décision favorable prenne immédiatement effet, pour autant que l'issue de la procédure n'en soit pas influencée ou qu'un examen sommaire révèle que le recours est manifestement mal fondé.

← Art. 67a Loi sur la procédure et la juridiction administratives (LPJA) Dispositions générales - Champ d'application Art. 69 Loi sur la procédure et la juridiction administratives (LPJA) →

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cette disposition s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez ce texte législatif avec la jurisprudence, la doctrine et les dispositions connexes dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (101)

2025 GSI 1878 · be (Art. 68 Abs. 2 VRPG)
Administrative Prohibition on Childcare Upheld Due to History of Alcohol-Related Incidents
The provision authorizing the competent authority to order that an appeal does not have suspensive effect for important reasons.
2025 GSI 1878 · be (Art. 68 Abs. 4 VRPG)
Administrative Prohibition on Childcare Upheld Due to History of Alcohol-Related Incidents
The instructing authority's power to decide on the suspension of effect during the appeal process, justifying the denial of suspensive effect in the final order.
200 2025 377 · be (Art. 68 und 82 VRPG)
Social Assistance Reimbursement Upheld Despite Hardship Claim
Cited in the reasoning to explain why the obligation to repay was suspended during the appeal proceedings, thereby influencing the assessment of proportionality at the time of the current judgment.
200 2025 442 · be (Art. 68 Abs. 5 lit. a VRPG)
Appeal Against Denial of Restoring Suspensive Effect to Social Assistance Reduction
Cited as the legal basis for concluding that important reasons existed for the initial denial of the suspensive effect.
SK 2025 220 · be (art. 68 al. 1 LPJA)
Denial of Prison Sentence Postponement for Apprenticeship Completion
Cited in the reasoning to confirm that the appeal has suspensive effect.
120 2025 43 · be (Art. 68 Abs. 4 VRPG)
Administrative Director Overturns Immediate Ban on Mobile Phone Facility Components
Mentioned in the reasoning section concerning the precautionary measure of restoring the suspensive effect, although the request was ultimately declared moot under Art. 39 Abs. 1 VRPG.
120 2024 52 · be (Art. 68 al. 1 LPJA)
Co-Owners Appeal Costs Assessment After Partial Reversal of Privacy Screen Removal Order
Cited in the final decision (Order 4) for ordering the City of Bienne to pay costs to the appellant party.
120 2025 13 · be (Art. 68 Abs. 4 VRPG)
Appeal Challenging Lifted Hot Food Ban Due to Ventilation Filter Verification
Cited in the reasoning when addressing the procedural issue of suspending execution, which was then declared moot in the dispositive.
2025 GSI 468 · be (Art. 68 VRPG)
Apothecary License Withdrawal Appeal Regarding Illicit Codeine Trade
Cited as the legal basis for denying suspensive effect to any appeal against this decision, due to important reasons (protection of public health).
2024 GSI 2466 · be (Art. 68 Abs. 2 VRPG)
Physician License Revocation for Medically Unjustifiable Practices and Loss of Trustworthiness
The court used this provision to order that the appeal against the main decision is denied suspensive effect.
100 2024 384 · be (Art. 68 Abs. 1 VRPG)
Physician License Withdrawal Suspension Lifted Due to Undue Delay
Mentioned as the general rule establishing the suspensive effect of an appeal, which the decision overturns in part.
100 2024 384 · be (Art. 68 Abs. 4 VRPG)
Physician License Withdrawal Suspension Lifted Due to Undue Delay
Cited as the basis allowing the lower court to reconsider the provisional granting of the suspensive effect if circumstances change.
100 2024 384 · be (Art. 74 Abs. 3 i.V.m. Art. 61 Abs. 1 Bst. g und Abs. 3 Bst. a VRPG bzw. Art. 68 Abs. 3 VRPG)
Physician License Withdrawal Suspension Lifted Due to Undue Delay
Used in the reasoning section to confirm the self-standing appealability of the decision on suspensive effect, but not explicitly cited in the final orders (dispositive).
2024 GSI 1863 · be (Art. 68 Abs. 1 VRPG)
Refugee Sanction Upheld for Failure to Meet Job Application Quota
Cited in the reasoning concerning the effect of appeal (suspensive effect) when discussing the enforcement of the penalty.
SK 2024 326 · be (Art. 68 Abs. 4 VRPG)
Cantonal Directorate Security v. Convicted Individual (Electronic Monitoring Application Denial)
Used in the dispositive (order 1) to rule on the restoration of the suspensive effect of the appeal.