Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
155.21 VRPGLPJALGA CH-BE

Art. 28 Loi sur la procédure et la juridiction administratives (LPJA) - Relation avec le fond

Règles de procédure - Mesures provisionnelles
Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (140 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 28 Loi sur la procédure et la juridiction administratives (LPJA) · Relation avec le fond

1. Au moment où la mesure provisionnelle est ordonnée, un délai est imparti pour déposer l'action ou la requête au fond si l'instance n'a pas encore été introduite.

2. L'ordonnance de la mesure provisionnelle tombe dès que le jugement au fond est passé en force.

← Art. 27 Loi sur la procédure et la juridiction administratives (LPJA) Dispositions générales - Champ d'application Art. 29 Loi sur la procédure et la juridiction administratives (LPJA) →

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cette disposition s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez ce texte législatif avec la jurisprudence, la doctrine et les dispositions connexes dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (4)

120 2023 20 · be (Art. 28 Abs. 2 VRPG)
Citizen Lacks Standing to Challenge Fresco Alteration Ban Reversal
The previously ordered provisional measure was revoked because the main proceedings concluded (by non-entry into the appeal).
100 2020 275 · be (Art. 28 Abs. 2 VRPG)
Autistic Individual v. Canton of Bern: Funding for Continued Specialized Care Post-Schooling
Cited as the legal basis for precautionary measures becoming obsolete upon the final resolution of the main procedure.
100 2019 44 · be (Art. 28 Abs. 2 VRPG)
Family Reunion Application Rejected Based on Res Judicata After Citizenship Revocation
Cited in the reasoning to state that a decision on the request for procedural residence is rendered moot by the main decision.
100 2016 83 · be (Art. 51 N. 14, Art. 49 N. 20, Art. 65 N. 6, Art. 32 N. 14, Art. 28 N. 5, Art. 43 N. 13 of Merkli/Aeschlimann/Herzog, Kommentar zum bernischen VRPG)
Cantonal Court Upholds City Council Decision Against Mandatory Vote on Ice and Water Facility Financing Regulation
Cited as commentary references (though not legislative provisions, they are cited in the reasoning related to procedural points reviewed by the court, particularly concerning standing and formal requirements; however, based strictly on the extraction rule targeting 'legal provisions,' only legislative articles are typically extracted. Since these are cited throughout the reasoning sections that lead to the final orders, but do not appear in the final orders (1, 2, 3), they are excluded unless the rule implies citing all procedural framework cited internally. Sticking strictly to the rule: only legislative acts cited in the dispositive. None of these commentary citations appear in the dispositive (1-3).