Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
I PK 192/07 Généré par l'IA

Dismissed: Employee's claim to return to work after fixed-term contract termination is inadmissible, barring damages award.

Numéro de cause I PK 192/07
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Partiellement admis (Partially Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the employee's cassation appeal regarding the award of damages for wrongful termination of a fixed-term employment contract. The lower court had granted damages because the employer failed to obtain necessary medical and scientific council consent for dismissal, violating specific protection statutes. However, the Supreme Court ruled that since the employee's complaint was limited solely to reinstatement, the court could not award damages as an alternative remedy under the relevant labor code provisions.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 50 § 5 k.p.; Art. 4771 k.p.c.: Where an employee limits their claim solely to reinstatement after termination of a fixed-term contract outside the circumstances of Art. 50 § 5 k.p., the labor court cannot award damages as an alternative remedy.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
fixed-term contract termination reinstatement claim inadmissibility alternative remedy damages labor code procedural rules cassation appeal dismissal employment protection statutes two-instance procedure

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 50 § 5 k.p.
Art. 4771 k.p.c.
Art. 50 § 3 k.p.
Art. 383 k.p.c.
Art. 367 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 379 pkt 5 k.p.c.
Art. 3983 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c.
Art. 39815 k.p.c.
Art. 108 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 39814 k.p.c.

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
I PKN 414/98
Supreme Court allows reinstatement for fixed-term contract termination without specific termination clause via analogy.
II PK 294/04
Supreme Court dismisses appeal on long-term fixed-term contract termination as not evading labor law.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet