II PK 165/06
Généré par l'IA
Court dismissed appeal; voluntary agreement trip is not business travel under Art. 775 § 1 k.p.
Pologne (PL)
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal against a labor court ruling that denied business travel allowances. The plaintiff argued he was forced on a business trip to China, but the court found the arrangement was a voluntary agreement changing his job role and location. Consequently, the court held that such consensual delegations do not constitute business travel under the relevant labor code provisions.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAArt. 775 § 1 k.p.; Art. 213 § 2 k.p.c.; A voluntary agreement to travel for work does not constitute business travel under the Labor Code, as business travel requires a mandatory employer order.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IA
business travel definition
labor code provisions
employer order requirement
voluntary agreement trip
business travel allowances
job role change
cassation appeal dismissal
Dispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IAArt. 775 § 1 k.p.
Art. 213 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 42 § 4 k.p.
art. 775 § 1 k.p
art. 213 § 2 k.p.c
art. 65 k.c
art. 774 ust. 2 k.p
art. 775 k.p
art. 203 § 4 k.p.c
art. 774 pkt 2 k.p
Jurisprudence citée
Généré par l'IAI PKN 424/00
Supreme Court dismissed appeal; business trip defined by task location, not employer headquarters.
III CSK 13/05
Supreme Court dismisses cassation appeal based solely on facts or evidence evaluation as inadmissible under new Civil Procedure Code.
I CSK 63/05
RZECZYPOSPOLITEJ POLSKIEJ Dnia 17 marca 2006 r.