Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
I UK 56/04 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court dismissed cassation, ruling the 5-year insurance requirement for post-30 disability pensions is not unequal treatment.

Numéro de cause I UK 56/04
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by Zdzisław T. against a Social Insurance Office decision denying him a disability pension. The applicant argued that the statutory requirement for five years of insurance within the last ten years before disability constituted unequal treatment under the Constitution. The court rejected this claim, explaining that the specific insurance period requirement is a necessary condition for the right to benefits, ensuring that only those currently covered by the insurance fund receive payments.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 58 ust. 2 ustawy o emeryturach i rentach z Funduszu Ubezpieczeń Społecznych; The requirement for a five-year insurance period within the last ten years for disability pensions acquired after age 30 does not constitute unequal treatment but reflects the causal link between the right to benefits and the period of insurance coverage.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
disability pension insurance period requirement unequal treatment Social Insurance Office cassation appeal Fundusz Ubezpieczeń Społecznych age 30 threshold

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 58 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 17 grudnia 1998 r. o emeryturach i rentach z Funduszu Ubezpieczeń Społecznych
Art. 393 § 12 k.p.c.
art. 210 § 1 k.p.c
art. 379 pkt 5 k.p.c
art. 328 § 2 k.p.c
art. 391 k.p.c
art. 385 k.p.c
art. 3931 k.p.c
art. 3931 pkt 2 k.p.c
art. 3931 pkt 1 k.p.c

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet