Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
I PKN 23/96 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court dismisses appeal where employer unilaterally changes bonus rules retroactively without employee consent under Labor Code.

Numéro de cause I PKN 23/96
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the Ombudsman's cassation appeal against a lower court ruling that rejected an employee's claim for a bonus. The employee argued that a new bonus regulation, which made the award dependent on the employer's discretionary approval, could not apply retroactively to the period before its effective date. The court held that if the right to the bonus stems from the employment contract, such a detrimental change requires the employee's consent, rendering the unilateral retroactive modification void.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 42 Kodeksu Pracy; Art. 387 Kodeksu Postępowania Cywilnego: A unilateral change to bonus regulations detrimental to the employee, effective retroactively without their consent, violates the principle of good faith and contractual stability when the right to the bonus arises from the employment contract.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
retroactive bonus regulation unilateral contract modification employee consent requirement detrimental change validity labor code provisions discretionary approval bonus expectation right protection

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 42 Kodeksu Pracy
Art. 387 Kodeksu Postępowania Cywilnego
Art. 393 § 1 Kodeksu Postępowania Cywilnego

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
APr 8/95

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet