Court dismissed enforcement of foreign judgment due to lack of jurisdiction and procedural defects.
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe Tartu Regional Court dismissed the enforcement application for a foreign judgment against the applicant. The applicant argued the judgment was final, while the respondent contended the foreign court lacked jurisdiction and the proceedings were procedurally flawed. The court ruled that the foreign judgment could not be enforced because the respondent was not properly served and the foreign court had no jurisdiction over the dispute.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAArt. 17 ust. 1 k.r.s.; Art. 18 k.r.s.: A foreign judgment may not be enforced if the foreign court lacked jurisdiction or if the defendant was not properly served with the summons.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IATexte complet
!"# $%&%
#'"# "# (%) *%%)+ ,-. "+ /////////0 &% '%# "% #") 1 "# (%)" !%) #% 2)% %3 1 "&%#%2 '2)) $!2 "%%4% 5 3 *#&&6 2 -770 "# (%)" !%) % 1 # #%8%7 , 2%1%3*#%%0&# ) "# (%) #"%" %" $!2 "%%4% !"# "%%622 %66 2)% 2)%" %"6" , &# 6" &&6!% ("%" % 2)%" %%"%" $!2 "%%4%" "# (%)2)%66%2)% '%2)%6"3# "#(%)""%%66 , &&%&%%"6 !"#"%%622%6"
&&"#!%%)&& !"#6""""" )% ! "# $!2 "%%4%53*#&&62-770%% "#(%)""%)9""#%3#%8%7,2%3
*0 "#(%)"2#&%"%" 288)"2%"#%&&)&62)7#%&%%&3% "%2))2%2388)""%"#7%"""%2!::7""&" &%#%2)%%3 88)"2#")"#%#%)" "# 2%"%7#")2!62))6"")%" ( 9 "3 " % &%# &%% #") "" && #% 2)% %3 ##" %)% 9" 7 % 88)"2 % " #% #%2 &&) &62) #!% ) #% %&3%6&3%7#%&%%&3%"%2))688)""% "#7%"""%2!:: 9"!%3,2&)7%88)"2%""&&)#!%!%) #%72)#%%376#%82"#%8%" #8&#%2%23%"&&28&# 2 "#(%)%"#%2)&&)&67#%&%%&3 %"%2))2%23"%"#7%"""%2!::7!2#6"" "))#2))%37#3782"#%&#&&" #8::&#% 3 88)"2 & 2) $!2 "%%4% 5 3 *#&&62-770!%)#%"*+0&#% $%&% 2%