Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
BS-976/2008-RAN ECLI:DK:RAN:2024:BS0000001257 Généré par l'IA

Court of Appeal of Randers dismissed appeal on lack of res judicata effect of first-instance judgment.

Numéro de cause BS-976/2008-RAN
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Danemark (DK)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Court of Appeal of Randers dismissed the appellant's appeal regarding the binding force of a prior judgment. The appellant argued that a previous decision between the same parties lacked res judicata effect, while the respondent contended the first-instance ruling was final. The court held that the prior judgment possessed full legal force, thereby rejecting the claim that it could be re-litigated.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Section 227 of the Code of Civil Procedure; Section 228 of the Code of Civil Procedure: A judgment rendered by a court of first instance acquires res judicata effect upon expiration of the appeal period, binding the parties to the same dispute.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
res judicata Code of Civil Procedure finality of judgment appeal dismissal same parties binding force litigation status droit à des dommages-intérêts

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Section 227 of the Code of Civil Procedure
Section 228 of the Code of Civil Procedure
Généré par l'IA
BS-2252/2008-VLR
Court dismisses appeal where prior judgment lacks real effect and cannot be treated as final in duplicate cases.
SS-2828/2012-OLR
Court upholds lower court ruling that judges remain impartial despite witness's past service on the bench.
BS-632/2006-RAN
Court awards damages for property defects under consumer protection law, rejecting seller's indemnity claim.
BS-974/2011-VLR
Court upholds dismissal of claim but increases compensation amount due to procedural delay.
BS-35041/2021-SHR
Court denies negative res judicata for prior competition law claim due to distinct contract periods and legitimate re-litigation.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Sagen vedrører spørgsmålet om, hvorvidt en dom afsagt af retten i Randers har retskraft i to adcitationssager mellem de samme to parter