Court dismisses appeal against continued detention and isolation order due to lack of new evidence of danger. The court ruled that the original justification for the restrictive measures remains valid without fresh proof. Consequently, the detention and isolation orders are upheld against the appellant's challenge.

The court dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant against the continued detention and isolation measures. The appellant argued that the original grounds for these restrictions were no longer relevant or that new circumstances warranted a change in status. The court rejected this, finding that the initial assessment of the appellant's danger to society remained substantiated and no new evidence necessitated a revision of the orders.