Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
AS-570/2010-NYK ECLI:DK:NYK:2024:AS0000000004 Généré par l'IA

Court dismisses claim for pro-rata distribution of court-deposited funds among multiple creditors.

Numéro de cause AS-570/2010-NYK
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Danemark (DK)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The court dismissed the plaintiff's request to receive a pro-rata share of a sum deposited with the court by the defendant. The defendant argued that the deposited funds should be distributed equally among all creditors, while the plaintiff contended for priority based on their specific claim. The court ruled that the deposit was intended to secure the defendant's obligations and did not create a joint fund for pro-rata distribution among unsecured creditors.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure; Section 116 of the Code of Civil Procedure: When a sum is deposited with the court to secure a claim, it does not become a common fund available for pro-rata distribution among multiple creditors, but remains subject to the specific rights and priorities of the underlying claims.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
court deposit pro-rata distribution creditor priority civil procedure secured claim joint fund distribution of assets déposant

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure
Section 116 of the Code of Civil Procedure
Généré par l'IA
BS-3110/2011-OLR
Court dismissed landlord's priority claim as a notice under Housing Regulation Act does not create a mortgage.
BS-477/2009-OLR
Court allows bank's request to interrupt statute of limitations after debtor filed insolvency declaration.
BS-5993/2017-ALB
Danish court awards partial spousal compensation to incapacitated husband for wife's mismanagement of joint assets.
FS-10090/2010-HJO
Court dismisses claim for excessive collection fees due to statutory cap on recurring charges.
BS-74/2019-VLR
Court allows claim to proceed after finding statute of limitations interrupted by 2009 assignment request.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Kendelse om fordeling blandt fordringshaverne af et i fogedretten deponeret beløb