Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
BS-17/2014-HJR ECLI:DK:HJR:2024:BS0000000508 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court allows employer's insurance company to recover overpaid difference compensation from employee's liability insurer.

Numéro de cause BS-17/2014-HJR
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Danemark (DK)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court upheld the lower court's decision regarding the recovery of difference compensation paid by an employer's liability insurer. The appellant argued that the employee should bear the cost, but the court found the employer's insurer had a right of recourse. Consequently, the court ruled that the employer's insurance company could recover the overpaid amount from the employee's liability insurer.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Erstatningsansvarsloven § 10; Erstatningsansvarsloven § 11: The employer's liability insurer has a right of recourse against the employee's liability insurer for difference compensation paid to the employer, which the employee is ultimately liable for.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
employer liability insurance employee liability insurance difference compensation right of recourse subrogation claim workplace injury insurance recovery restitution d'indemnités RHT

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Erstatningsansvarsloven § 10
Erstatningsansvarsloven § 11
Généré par l'IA
BS-4362/2012-OLR
Court dismisses claim that employer's liability insurer must pay difference compensation to employee's own insurer.
BS-8/2020-GLR
Employer dismissed sick employee without notice after address change; court finds dismissal unlawful and awards damages.
BS-621/2006-OLR
Employment dispute dismissed; court upholds dismissal and wage claims against employer under equality law.
BS-5908/2024-VLR
Court upholds lower court's decision on legal costs in a workplace injury compensation case.
BS-24/2012-HJR
Consumer protection law bars buyers from claiming physical defects if they received a condition report and transfer insurance.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Højesteret stadfæster landsrettens dom i sag vedrørende spørgsmålet, om arbejdsskadeforsikringsselskabet med rette har udbetalt den forhøjede erstatning til det ansvarsforsikringsselskab, som på vegne af appellantens tidligere arbejdsgiver har udbetalt differenceerstatning efter erstatningsansvarsloven, eller om beløbet tilkommer appellanten selv

[DOKUMENT] Afgørelse (2 sider)

Appellant

Appellanten

Appellanten

Anonymiseret