Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
5 B 58/09, 5 B 58/09 (5 C 15/10) Généré par l'IA

Exclusion of severely disabled candidate from interview based on exam grades: scope of prohibition of discrimination under SGB IX and AGG

Numéro de cause 5 B 58/09, 5 B 58/09 (5 C 15/10)
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) granted permission for appeal in a social law dispute, allowing the revision to proceed to the merits without deciding on the final substantive outcome. The case concerns a candidate, legally treated as a severely disabled person, who challenged a public employer's decision not to invite her to a job interview, allegedly due to her poor examination grades, thereby asserting a violation of her rights under the General Equal Treatment Act (AGG) and the Social Code Part IX (SGB IX). The court held that the appeal meets the threshold of "fundamental legal significance" under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, as it raises the unresolved legal question of how § 82 Satz 2 und 3 SGB IX and § 22 AGG are to be interpreted when a candidate with severe disability status is excluded from the selection process based on academic performance.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; Exclusion of severely disabled candidate from interview based on exam grades: scope of prohibition of discrimination under SGB IX and AGG: The case concerns a candidate, legally treated as a severely disabled person, who challenged a public employer's decision not to invite her to a job interview, allegedly due to her poor examination grades, thereby asserting a violation of her rights under the General Equal Treatment Act (AGG) and the Social Code Part IX (SGB IX). The court held that the appeal meets the threshold of "fundamental legal significance" under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, as it raises the unresolved legal question of how § 82 Satz 2 und 3 SGB IX and § 22 AGG are to be interpreted when a candidate with severe disability status is excluded from the selection process based on academic performance.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
discrimination fondée sur un handicap égalité de traitement cas d'exclusion exclusion sociale positions administratives examen au fond

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for admitting the appeal to revision due to the fundamental legal significance of the case.
Généré par l'IA
5 C 16/10
Duty to interview disabled applicants under SGB IX: exclusion from interview cannot rebut discrimination presumption based solely on unstated exam grades
8 AZR 188/12
Exclusion of suitable disabled applicant from interview: irrebuttability of discrimination presumption despite selective invitation of other disabled candidates
5 B 31/12
Scope of "obvious professional unsuitability" and prohibition of "ideal" criteria in justifying denial of interview for severely disabled applicants under the AGG
8 AZR 384/14
Direct discrimination via exclusion from interview despite sufficient disclosure of severe disability in application letter
8 AZR 697/10
Employment of severely disabled applicants by public authorities: mandatory interview requirement and limits of internal integration agreements under SGB IX and AGG

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for admitting the appeal to revision due to the fundamental legal significance of the case.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Bewerbung schwerbehinderter Menschen; Vorstellungsgespräch; fachliche Eignung

[GRUENDE]

Die Revision gegen das Urteil des Verwaltungsgerichtshofs Baden-Württemberg vom 4. August 2009 ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen. Die Revision kann Gelegenheit zur Klärung geben, wie § 82 Satz 2 und 3 SGB IX sowie § 22 AGG auszulegen sind, wenn eine einem Schwerbehinderten gleichgestellte Bewerberin mit Blick auf ihre Examensnoten nicht zu einem Vorstellungsgespräch eingeladen wird.