Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
5 PB 4/24, 5 PB 4/24 (5 P 5/24) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2024:121224B5PB4.24.0 Généré par l'IA

Eligibility of extra-judicial attorney fees as necessary works council expenses under § 42 Abs. 1 PersVG LSA

Numéro de cause 5 PB 4/24, 5 PB 4/24 (5 P 5/24)
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Administrative Court overturned the Higher Administrative Court’s decision denying leave to appeal and ordered the admission of the applicant’s legal complaint, thereby prevailing for the applicant in the procedural stage. The dispute concerned whether attorney fees incurred outside the context of a judicial order proceeding constituted necessary expenses for the activity of the works council under German public service law, which had been contested by the authority. The decision rests on the finding of a decisive legal question of fundamental significance regarding the classification of such costs under § 42 Abs. 1 PersVG LSA in conjunction with §§ 78 Abs. 2 PersVG LSA, 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1, and 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG, establishing that the matter requires review by the Senate to clarify the statutory interpretation.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG, § 42 Abs. 1 PersVG LSA; Eligibility of extra-judicial attorney fees as necessary works council expenses under § 42 Abs. 1 PersVG LSA: The dispute concerned whether attorney fees incurred outside the context of a judicial order proceeding constituted necessary expenses for the activity of the works council under German public service law, which had been contested by the authority. The decision rests on the finding of a decisive legal question of fundamental significance regarding the classification of such costs under § 42 Abs. 1 PersVG LSA in conjunction with §§ 78 Abs. 2 PersVG LSA, 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1, and 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG, establishing that the matter requires review by the Senate to clarify the statutory interpretation.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
honoraires d'avocat réclamation administrative contrôle juridictionnel objet du litige décisions incidentes bénéfice

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG
1, § 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG wegen einer entscheidungserheblichen Rechtsfrage von grundsätzlicher Bedeutung zuzulassen.
§ 42 Abs. 1 PersVG LSA
Identifies the substantive provision defining necessary costs for the works council's activity, which is the subject of the legal question justifying the admission of the appeal.
Généré par l'IA
5 P 5.24
Reimbursement of staff council's external legal advice costs: partial legal capacity and "necessity" requirement under § 42 PersVG
6 PB 21/10
Works council attorney fees in decision-making proceedings: Limitation of employer reimbursement obligation to statutory rates despite private fee agreements and rejection of trust protection for excess costs
2 A 5/09
Reimbursement of attorney fees in administrative disciplinary proceedings based on necessity under BDG and VwGO
5 C 6/23
Legal aid for staff council litigation: financial necessity negated by statutory employer cost-bearing obligation under § 46 BPersVG
7 ABR 8/15
Works council attorney fees for interest and social plan negotiations: necessity of hourly fee agreement versus statutory fee caps

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 78 Abs. 2 PersVG LSA i. V. m. § 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1, § 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG

Serves as the legal basis for admitting the legal complaint due to a decisive legal question of fundamental significance.

§ 42 Abs. 1 PersVG LSA

Identifies the substantive provision defining necessary costs for the works council's activity, which is the subject of the legal question justifying the admission of the appeal.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Revisionszulassung; Rechtsanwaltskosten des Personalrats

[TENOR]

Die Entscheidung des Oberverwaltungsgerichts des Landes Sachsen-Anhalt - Fachsenat für Landespersonalvertretungssachen - über die Nichtzulassung der Rechtsbeschwerde gegen seinen Beschluss vom 6. Februar 2024 wird aufgehoben.

Die Rechtsbeschwerde des Antragstellers wird zugelassen.

[GRUENDE]

Die Rechtsbeschwerde des Antragstellers ist gemäß § 78 Abs. 2 PersVG LSA i. V. m. § 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1, § 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG wegen einer entscheidungserheblichen Rechtsfrage von grundsätzlicher Bedeutung zuzulassen.

Die vorliegende Rechtssache kann dem Senat Gelegenheit geben, zur Frage der Einordnung von Rechtsanwaltskosten außerhalb eines gerichtlichen Beschlussverfahrens als notwendige Kosten der Tätigkeit des Personalrats im Sinne von § 42 Abs. 1 PersVG LSA Stellung zu nehmen.