Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
2 BvR 3024/14, 2 BvR 177/15, 2 BvR 601/15 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2015:rs20150722.2bvr302414 Généré par l'IA

Constitutional complaint procedure: Mootness, expense reimbursement under § 34a BVerfGG, and subject matter value determination

Numéro de cause 2 BvR 3024/14, 2 BvR 177/15, 2 BvR 601/15
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige struck_off
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court dismissed the connected constitutional complaint proceedings as moot due to their extinction in the main subject matter, ruling in favor of the complainants by ordering the respondent state to reimburse their necessary legal expenses under § 34a Abs. 3 BVerfGG and fixing the value in dispute for both the main complaint and the interim relief procedures at a total of €10,000. The case involved a procedural motion regarding the final disposition of multiple joined constitutional complaints following a de facto resolution of the underlying dispute, necessitating a formal settlement of costs and procedural fees. The decision rests on the specific statutory provisions governing expense reimbursement in constitutional proceedings and the court's authority to determine the subject matter value for attorney fee calculations.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 34a Abs. 3 BVerfGG; Constitutional complaint procedure: Mootness, expense reimbursement under § 34a BVerfGG, and subject matter value determination: 3 BVerfGG and fixing the value in dispute for both the main complaint and the interim relief procedures at a total of €10,000. The case involved a procedural motion regarding the final disposition of multiple joined constitutional complaints following a de facto resolution of the underlying dispute, necessitating a formal settlement of costs and procedural fees. The decision rests on the specific statutory provisions governing expense reimbursement in constitutional proceedings and the court's authority to determine the subject matter value for attorney fee calculations.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
griefs de procédure objet du litige motivation insuffisante des griefs constitutionnels fixation des honoraires d'avocat remboursement de frais conduite du procès

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 34a Abs. 3 BVerfGG
Cited as the legal basis for ordering the reimbursement of necessary legal expenses to the complainants.
Généré par l'IA
2 BvR 52/25
Reimbursement of expenses and value in dispute following mootness of constitutional complaint: lack of equitable basis and absence of legitimate interest in judicial valuation
2 BvR 257/21
Reimbursement of legal expenses and subject matter valuation for constitutional complaint declared moot after lower constitutional court annulled the challenged decision
1 BvR 210/09
Reimbursement of constitutional complaint costs after declination of moot complaint due to parallel judgment clarifying constitutional status of BKAG provisions
1 BvR 2500/15
Reimbursement of constitutional complaint costs under § 34a BVerfGG requires special equity grounds
1 BvR 614/20
Reimbursement of litigation expenses upon mootness of constitutional complaint following parallel state constitutional court ruling on expression and art freedoms

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 34a Abs. 3 BVerfGG

Cited as the legal basis for ordering the reimbursement of necessary legal expenses to the complainants.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Einstellung mehrerer Verfassungsbeschwerdeverfahren nach Erledigung - Anordnung der Auslagenerstattung und Gegenstandswertfestsetzung

[TENOR]

Nach Erledigung in der Hauptsache werden die verbundenen Verfahren eingestellt.

Der Freistaat Thüringen hat den Beschwerdeführern ihre notwendigen Auslagen zu erstatten (§ 34a Abs. 3 BVerfGG).

Der Wert des Gegenstands der anwaltlichen Tätigkeit wird für das Verfassungsbeschwerdeverfahren und für das Verfahren auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung in den verbundenen Verfahren jeweils auf insgesamt 10.000 € (in Worten: zehntausend Euro) festgesetzt.

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.