Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/983/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/983/2007 Généré par l'IA

Insurance Coverage Duty to Defend Interpretation of Exclusion Clause

Numéro de cause ATAS/983/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Partiellement admis (Partially Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case involves a dispute over insurance coverage where the appellant argued that their policy did not cover damages because the loss was not caused by an event listed in the policy, contending that the trial court erred in its interpretation of the exclusion clause concerning ongoing or recurring losses and the resulting duty to defend. The court reasoned that the policy's language, particularly regarding the time frame of covered losses and the definition of continuous or recurring damages, dictated coverage, and found that the underlying claim presented a factual scenario that could potentially fall within the scope of coverage, thereby triggering the insurer's duty to defend, even though some claims within the suit were clearly excluded.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Insurance Coverage Duty to Defend Interpretation of Exclusion Clause: The court reasoned that the policy's language, particularly regarding the time frame of covered losses and the definition of continuous or recurring damages, dictated coverage, and found that the underlying claim presented a factual scenario that could potentially fall within the scope of coverage, thereby triggering the insurer's duty to defend, even though some claims within the suit were clearly excluded.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
réserve d'assurance obligation d'indemniser de l'assureur surassurance manquement de l'assureur cas d'exclusion risque assuré

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Cited in the final order to regulate court costs.
Généré par l'IA
A/1245/2006
Insurance Coverage Dispute Over Policy Exclusion Interpretation
A/4071/2006
Insurance Policy Coverage Dispute and Exclusion Interpretation
A/987/2007
Insurance Policy Interpretation and Duty to Defend/Indemnify
A/2490/2003
Insurance Coverage Dispute and Policy Interpretation
A/522/2002
Insurance Coverage Dispute and Interpretation of Policy Language

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Cited in the final order to regulate court costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



            !" #  $!" #

%%

&' %()'* * * & '%* (

+,  !

 -! .+,  " # 



 !"#$#%  ! 

 ! !"#$&'()

*

++, +  +  "7  - + .. +/ . -  +       0)  +*12'34*#56 

                

  $89  

* /(

#. :2!* #3:)$&&59(!;!0  0 4!(* 4" )  !"##%69*    "  #%96 < ="** !"  *  #5 4*!0#%35.

$. ;77#'  4*7 :2!*4"*" 0 4!(*  "4*24!*" ) 4")>47<4 ; "4? *!2.

'.  :2!*  ) * ) "7*7  $@ 7") $&&5 *  "*" *! =77 0 "6!$&&54?"* 4*2.

@.  0 "*" 4*! *** 4")> 4*4"*** "7 4* !!< !**  )   4* < *  !2 * *  #54*!0#%35*$@7")$&&5.

9. +=2*  ! *44A

1  <=  *: "*" 77" B  ++  ,   +   +   - +        +/  +-  +        C  D E <  ) =")* B @=5$# 7. 6&  !!*  !2  < 4"**  !!*  ) !4* *  *"F* *!2!! %=96#7.%9!!*  )E <  ) ** =")*  !!*  ) B #59='@&7.'&.

6. * ! =*)""A

1 <= * "2!* 77" B  ++  ,   +   +   - +        +/  +-  +         C(D 4  #  4*!0 #%55E <  ) =")* B 56=36# 7. 5&  !!*  !2  < 4"**  !!*  ) !4* *  *"F*  *  !2  !!  #99=696 7. 99  !!*  )E <  ) ** =")*  !!*  )B@9@=5597.



    8%&'8$&&5 '89  

5.  !**"*"*!?4* * $'G*$&&5.: *  <"<=B "7* =0)* 4*F**  0.

3. =0 =0:*  "7?""*"2 "B:2.

* &%(

#. =*.$9 7" "042 4")>47 )))**) *" #5 "!0#%%'C/D*")2 #:)$&&&(24"   ).<:** 4 - 4** *B4*2C*.#$$*#$'   )1 D :2   )!4"** =*.5'.# 7" " 4")> 47  $9 : #%3$ CD * B ()  0 *  4#G*$&&' *4(<=77  "*"*!C*.#@$ D?"* =774*20  "  "4** "*!"4:2  ).

$. +=*.$$/C)*)2 4#:)$&&&D  )  4**  * < *  !2 * 4*2" 7!"!* ?*.#$$#$'#@#*#@$ E*.'B9 /=44<* 42!**B*7"C.#D.;<:*4**  *B4*24 B 77"*4** *2!*"  )  0 42 ?** ")*!*  !!*  ) *  4** *2!*" ) 042?**")*!* !!*  !2C7.*.$@/D.:* B  4**  * * B =)  0 42 ?**  !!*     !2  *"F*   !!*  ) C / #$3  $'&E /#$%@@@D.

 -4(  :2  4!( *   "  4*2 4 !*"  4**  * < *  !2 4  ! .  * 4*** -4* !2#54*!0#%35 -*4* $@7")$&&5 *B<:2!*  )* )?"*.

'. +  !* 4 *  4** < 4 *  !2 4  ! * $%%=##37.@9C@9@=5591#99=696.99D* <<4  !  *  #69=553 7. '9 C#59='@&.'& 1 %=96#.%9D  *"F* >* ":B "*" " 4  ***  4")> "7 .   !  *B?1"4!** #@%=99%7.$9C$%%=##3.@9A$D <=  *  !!  3$=33% 7. $& C#69=553.'9 A $D  * < -*  "7*) ! < *B?1"4!** 66=65&7.&9.

    8%&'8$&&5 @89  

@. 7!"!* B  :4  4  : "*!* 4  4*2 :<=!!* *7* 4** *  !:* )"0""7 4** *B *"F*!4* !** 1. *"F**"*?!!!"2=*.#$ = 4")>47)))**) *"  #3 ) #%3@ C $D    *? "2!*  1 * 4" C /40"'68&$ #3:*$&&'D.

9.  "!!*   4H  4"  "** 2** C*. 5' . $  * 3%I.# 4"  !**) #$4*!0#%39D.



JJJ



    8%&'8$&&5 989  

%  0 (/  %()'* * * & '%* (



#. )*  ++  ,   +   +   - +        + /  +  -  +          C  D B *7"  !4* !! 66=65&7.&9B ++ ,   +   +   - +        + /  +  -  +          C  D  7)   !  " #  <  *"F* !4*     "* (#!$&&5:<=!!* *7*.

$. -> !**< 0.

'. *<4" *2**.

@. 7!  4*   <- 4)* 7!  *  4"* F*   "  '& : (  *7* 4(  0 7" " C+;KL;7<66&&@  D4) !*(  * 407!"!*?*.3$ 7" " 07" " #5 : $&&9 C /DE  !"!   *  <   !*7 * !> 4)*4*2* * ! *E * F*  "  0 7" " 4 ) 4*  4 ) "*< ?  *  =*. @$  /.  4"* F* *  4(  4  *)<"!!!> 4) )*F*:*B=).  277(  " *A             // M+  M 47! 4"*F***7"?4*<-B-777" " 4277

    8%&'8$&&5