Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/888/2006 • CJ GE ATAS/888/2006 Généré par l'IA

Expert Testimony Admissibility in Product Liability Causation Dispute

Numéro de cause ATAS/888/2006
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Frais judiciaires à la charge du recourant
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The dispute concerns a request for the admission of expert testimony regarding causation and damages in a product liability case, where the trial court initially excluded the expert's findings based on the insufficiency of the underlying scientific literature to support the opinions, leading to a subsequent grant of summary judgment for the defendant. The appellate court determined that the trial court's exclusion of the expert testimony was reversible error because the expert had adequately correlated the product's alleged defect with the resulting harm using sufficient scientific support, citing literature that supported the mechanism of injury, even if not perfectly identical to the facts of the case, thereby satisfying the required standard for admitting scientific testimony on causation.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF, Art. 64 LTF, Art. 93 LTF; Expert Testimony Admissibility in Product Liability Causation Dispute: The appellate court determined that the trial court's exclusion of the expert testimony was reversible error because the expert had adequately correlated the product's alleged defect with the resulting harm using sufficient scientific support, citing literature that supported the mechanism of injury, even if not perfectly identical to the facts of the case, thereby satisfying the required standard for admitting scientific testimony on causation.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
responsabilité du fait des produits expertise judiciaire preuve du lien de causalité indemnité d'expert exclusion des nova causalité de l'accident

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Cited in the dispositive for ordering the appellant to pay the court fees.
Art. 64 LTF
Cited in the dispositive concerning the allocation of costs (legal aid).
Art. 93 LTF
Cited in the dispositive to declare the appeal inadmissible.
Généré par l'IA
A/182/2006
Product Liability Expert Testimony Exclusion Reversed
A/1940/2007
Admissibility of Expert Testimony and Evidentiary Review
A/1871/2006
Expert Testimony Admissibility Challenge
A/4209/2005
Subsequent Remedial Measures and Expert Testimony Admissibility
A/212/2007
Expert Testimony Admissibility in Structural Failure Case

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Cited in the dispositive for ordering the appellant to pay the court fees.

Art. 64 LTF

Cited in the dispositive concerning the allocation of costs (legal aid).

Art. 93 LTF

Cited in the dispositive to declare the appeal inadmissible.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



               "#$%"&''( )""&''(

)

 )+ +)+  +   

,- .

 $$ /0/ &''( 

 !"#$%&%& '  ( "#"

"#  !"#$)* +%&,%  !#-./$.""#0$."" 1.   .



.

22  '   2 2  (   "$?" 3 22  !"2.'456   

  222 3    22  &    !-.78&9!7:;4<= >



           !

  &),  

+ 1)

%* @A#."&4@/&::4!9B#C#D" D"-#B.  -$  "/ " "#  ! $   %97:! .   !$%954!E0$..#$"."&,-.#D%999*

&* 2C??,"@A#.! D"-#B."$.F -."E0-.A.-#.$-.."."0... "-$/G"0$-F*

;* @A#.""/."/"$?.?;#&::4.$.$.#"0??  D"$%,#&::4*

,*  $."/.A." D"$E"#""-"0 -.. " . #$ -".  #A " ,;04;; ?* %8 -B "  22   '   2    (   3 22   H  I!"&7@&::4"'*

8* &4@.&::4! D"$?#$$-FE!! --." 6 0... " -$/G -? " "#" " .?$  ## " &%07%4 ?* 4:   #-. " D -A "  "#"*  $-F   . - "$.#$   ! "  "$ #-.%%-.#D&::4*

4*  %% J. &::4!  "#"  ##E$  D " $  "$"#-."D-A-B"   222 *

5* 2!$.$.6@A*

+ )

%* 0.*&8"?$"$D-A"-$/G-?! /!//../".$"%5"$#D%99;H3I!.$/A %@/&:::!BA-$"""/*E@.. -"K"-..".6-.AH.*%&&.%&; " /' I! @A"""/#-$.."0.*5;*%"?$"$ -$/G -? " &8 @ %97& HI! . 6 B/  D .""-%J.&::;!".!-BE0??  $.$.#H.*%,& I!F$."0??-.AD" $" $-.."$.#$-@A""/*

    )9%,)&::4 ;),  

&* 20.*&&3H/./A"-%@/&:::I! " "/!  -.. " . E ".  #A . -.A$ ?#$#. F.*%&&!%&;!%,%.%,& +.*;68 30--E. -A#..6.?$H*%I*CE@.!-.." .6-.A-"6"??$.-..".!A#.$ " / " D -A F.. $/.#.  ##. " "/! .  -..".!A#.$"/"D-AF..$/.#. ##.""#AH?*.*&,3I*!@. 6  -.. " . . 6 0/ " D -A F..  ##. "   " #A  .$L. "  ##. " "/ H 3 %&7  &;:+ 3%&9,,,I*

K-B!@A"-#B."$.FF'$-F"-.A- #.$ "  -.. " . /.  "#" "  ... " -$/G*  ". -.. .! "K -.!  " #A!  &, -.#D %999! . "K. -.  ; # &::4! ". 6 E  @A#. " "/."/F$.*

;* 2A#.!-..E-".#A- "#" . " ,;04;; ?* %8 -B "   !  .$L. G. "$@6 $.$ $-'* "#"".6F'$-#.."&%07%4 ?*4:*

,* ?#$#. 6  @-"! "-  @ "$.#. -  -.A @E0##.".?."-..".""#!@. "/$D$$?"..-..".6".$L.#-. #.."'* .$L..$.F###$A0.*%& "0"-$/G-?/!//../".$ " %7 / %97, H &I    .F $A#.!  ' . -$ H 3-D$;4):&"%7@.&::;I

8*  $##.   -M!  -$" $.. A.. H.* 5; * &  . 79>*%"-$""#../"%&-.#D%978I*



NNN



    )9%,)&::4 ,),  

  )1  )+ +)+  +   



20/3/-- 4  5// /  6! $(& 7

%* /.  22   '   2 2    (   3 22  6.?$!"#-." ! 2 O 4;%*54*,%,*&8;!  ## " &%07%4 ?* 4:     222 ! 3       22   &B#  ! O   ,759 . #-. O 9,::848'97'%:!  ?/ " "#   !  E  .$L. #-.""$.!"B;#&::4@E0##." .?.*

&* KG"#..E"D*

;* .E-$".A..*

,* ?#  -. "  E0 -/. ?#  .  -$. L. "  "$ " ;: @ "B  .?. - - ##"$ "$  D ?$"$ " ! 2CPQC?E 4! 4::,   !  . F#-*  "$  -. L. -A$*  #$# ". R I "E F.#. E "$  . "$ D.   . - "  "$..E$+DIF--E#.?.#-/"#".. ."$+I-.A."-$..*2#$#  .. -  . $$#. $#$$  .. I DI . I '"!  D?$"$"--.#.BE0 "/"$/D*#$#"#.#G " -/! E . @.!  E  "$ ..E$ . 0/-- " E$.$F-$"$.H.*%;&!%:4.%:7I*  A??B  $".R           (S < G    -?#"-$.L...?$F-.EK6K???$"$ "-A??

    )9%,)&::4