Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/85/2006 • CJ GE ATAS/85/2006 Généré par l'IA

Property Tax Assessment Challenge Affirmed

Numéro de cause ATAS/85/2006
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A party challenged a determination that an increase in a property's assessed value for tax purposes was proper, arguing the valuation method used by the taxing authority was flawed because it failed to account for evidence suggesting the property's actual market value was lower due to specific physical characteristics and the surrounding area's economic stagnation. The court sustained the assessment, reasoning that the record demonstrated the taxing authority applied a recognized appraisal methodology, and while the property owner presented counter-evidence, the reviewing body was not clearly erroneous in finding that the evidence supporting the original assessment, based on comparable sales data, outweighed the subjective depreciation claims presented by the taxpayer.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Property Tax Assessment Challenge Affirmed: The court sustained the assessment, reasoning that the record demonstrated the taxing authority applied a recognized appraisal methodology, and while the property owner presented counter-evidence, the reviewing body was not clearly erroneous in finding that the evidence supporting the original assessment, based on comparable sales data, outweighed the subjective depreciation claims presented by the taxpayer.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
estimation fiscale immobilière valeur vénale de l'immeuble amortissement fiscal appréciation des preuves autorité fiscale valeur litigieuse

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
The court ordered the complainant to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Généré par l'IA
A/4090/2006
Tax Assessment Challenge Affirmed
A/1397/2004
Tax Assessment Valuation Method Challenge
A/2367/2007
Property Tax Valuation Method Dispute
A/3076/2006
Tax Assessment Challenge Affirmed Against Petitioner
A/1517/2007
Tax Assessment Valuation Dispute

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court ordered the complainant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

                

 

  !" #!!"   !#  # " 

#$%   & '( )*  



+ ,,,,,,,,,, !"#!$%%$$  &#!%%'(!  ) *    %

 -! ! ! ." ! -/   !!  . !" . ! 0! #  !%+ !,-.-,/,,   /0 !"#!$%  ! %$$&#!%%'(!  ) *    %



! 

-- # #!!"  "1!# !/"     $!$# %1+2!3/.,/,,   ,4



       

  )/5/)

 #% 6

& 7!% 8  %/+%#9 /--.%$!: 5,2/;5-4<6

%$% !$%%!$ %4- /--3!4,="$ /--.6

> %$! "!  !$= ?&$"$!%&!# $ 6  #  . - "  !" #!!"   !#  # "  & 3445   6 745+5%% 8 39  : ";<

,@ !A8  B ' %?& !$   @

/@  ! A &  %  ?&$   %#$$ %! !   ! %   %#$$ %&! $ %  !!$       #%C)!D# !$? %$#     %$ E! 9 A &E! BFFFFFFFFFF A   % ! $E G$ $9  $!$ %  !@ ,+   ! ,-   %  $  %#$@

4@ >1%!!?%9$@

3@ !G !$%?%#E" %  !!E$G#A2.-E @

.@  $!$ % > !@ .-   $E    !$ %  ?> "! E     !    #!  7! %  %#$ % 4- =  %H  !$E$!$   $ %# % #  $9 E#%#  %   BDI$J DE?$ 0 0--3   ! $G$ @%#$!7!  C#@#$ %$!K< $%$? G!!?%#$$  !%#$ 9!$ $! % %#$$!!?#69<G  ?!$E$!$"$ %% !!!  %#$$6< ! $C! %  #!!@B$#$ !$!   ! $ ##! ## #  !!  < 9< ! < $)%  $9 E#%#  %       !    !$H       ?>$ %"  %#   $ "9@  #$  %   !$     1 %  " ?$  ! =$! $$ ?  %#$$ !!?# ! >" % ?   #!# G#%$#  !: !@,4/,-0!,-;<@

 C EE$ K  #$%!K

$  B 9B

$E % #! 7!!!$E$#G !$ C EE



50//5/--.