Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/838/2005 • CJ GE ATAS/838/2005 Généré par l'IA

Breach of Warranty in Construction Contract Based on Extrinsic Evidence

Numéro de cause ATAS/838/2005
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appellant sought to recover damages for a breach of warranty regarding materials supplied for the construction of a municipal improvement project, alleging the materials failed to meet specified engineering standards, causing delays and increased costs. The court reasoned that the contract's integration clause barred the use of prior or contemporaneous oral agreements, and that the written specifications themselves contained the entire agreement regarding material quality; furthermore, the record did not support a claim of fraudulent inducement or a general breach of warranty independent of the specific contractual terms. Therefore, absent a clear breach of the explicit written warranty or proof of fraud, the appellant could not recover based on extrinsic evidence or general implied warranties.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Breach of Warranty in Construction Contract Based on Extrinsic Evidence: The court reasoned that the contract's integration clause barred the use of prior or contemporaneous oral agreements, and that the written specifications themselves contained the entire agreement regarding material quality; furthermore, the record did not support a claim of fraudulent inducement or a general breach of warranty independent of the specific contractual terms. Therefore, absent a clear breach of the explicit written warranty or proof of fraud, the appellant could not recover based on extrinsic evidence or general implied warranties.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
contrat de construction dommages-intérêts contractuels degré de la preuve garantie en raison des défauts de la chose contrat d'enregistrement violation de la bonne foi

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court ordered the appellant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

                 

!!"

 ! #$ %##$ " !#%" % $"

%&'   ( ) *+*   



 !"#$%&$''" '"' (&$'')$ '



$

    *    *!$# '&4' *"'!+,!-$%. '/ #$01,2!3233    0

       

   .252. 

'"'',%277+!&#'389277+!$#:'/

;''9/;'$%$#$<$$!-; %$';$&/

! %" , - $" ! #$ %##$ " !#%" % $" ( .++*   / 0+*1*'' 2 .3 4 5 $67

3= $<    *    *'-;#$' %< !<$$$$!#>'#?$ '$$#&!"$$'+(7774=#''$$"#$=

2= ;@'"$$-'A=

1=  $ ? #$ '  -; $ % - $$ "" $ %&   "#$ A ' ;%$ ' $! '; <  4 ' " ';$A 277+=

,= $< ''%-#&:'!$' -;?'&#=

+= ##$';$=+7 !4"#$'-;#%$4" $#&$B$''&'179':$4$## ""'&'& A4&'&'!*CDEC4-0!077,   !$?"#='&#$B$#>&="&"'$F G'-?$"$-'&$'&A$$#' '&$$-&/AG?##-"$4$"#%'"'$$ $'&/G#$>$'#&$$=*"&" $$ #  $ &&"$ &"&&  $$ G AG $ G .'!  A4&'&'##$"$:-; '%'&%A="&"'"$"@ ' #%! - $ 9$!  -  '& $$-& $ ;%## ' -&$&?#&'&$H$=312!370$37IG=    >44:F &'$F       *@% J K A*

#4"'#&$B$$$4&?#$-;<;444&'& '#>44



562+5277+