Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/806/2014 • CJ GE ATAS/806/2014 Généré par l'IA

Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Supplementary Benefits Decision

Numéro de cause ATAS/806/2014
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige struck_off
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A party appealed a supplementary benefits service decision primarily concerning an outstanding medical invoice of CHF 88.30, but subsequently informed the court upon receiving notice of a personal appearance hearing that they were withdrawing both their opposition and their appeal. The court acknowledged the withdrawal of the appeal and ordered the case to be removed from the roll.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Supplementary Benefits Decision: The court acknowledged the withdrawal of the appeal and ordered the case to be removed from the roll.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
prestations complémentaires retrait de l'opposition révocation de rentes sociales audition personnelle reconsidération de la rente AI renvoi ad separatum

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision is typically cited in the dispositive for ordering costs when a final decision is rendered, although it is not explicitly quoted as the basis for ordering costs in this specific, very short dispositive (which only orders taking note of the withdrawal and striking the case). However, in standard Swiss practice for such outcomes, costs (if any were ordered, though none are explicitly mentioned here) would fall under this article. Since the prompt strictly requires inclusion ONLY if explicitly cited in the dispositive, and no articles are explicitly cited in orders 1 and 2, the result must be an empty array, as no provisions meet the strict criteria for inclusion.
Généré par l'IA
A/1457/2022
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Supplementary Benefits Service Decision
A/1947/2023
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Supplementary Benefits Service Decision
A/2615/2008
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Supplementary Benefits Service Decision
A/4080/2024
Withdrawal of Appeal in Supplementary Benefits Case
A/1776/2014
Claimant Withdraws Appeal of Supplementary Benefits Decision

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision is typically cited in the dispositive for ordering costs when a final decision is rendered, although it is not explicitly quoted as the basis for ordering costs in this specific, very short dispositive (which only orders taking note of the withdrawal and striking the case). However, in standard Swiss practice for such outcomes, costs (if any were ordered, though none are explicitly mentioned here) would fall under this article. Since the prompt strictly requires inclusion ONLY if explicitly cited in the dispositive, and no articles are explicitly cited in orders 1 and 2, the result must be an empty array, as no provisions meet the strict criteria for inclusion.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

REPUBLIQUE ET CANTON DE GENEVE

POUVOIR JUDICIAIRE

A/852/2014 ATAS/806/2014

COUR DE JUSTICE Chambre des assurances sociales

Arrêt du 27 juin 2014 9ème Chambre

En la cause

Madame A______, domiciliée à COINTRIN recourante

contre

SERVICE DES PRESTATIONS COMPLEMENTAIRES, sis intimé DEAS - SPC; Route de Chêne 54; Case postale 6375, GENEVE

Siégeant : Francine PAYOT ZEN-RUFFINEN, Présidente; Pierre-Bernard PETITAT et Jean-Pierre WAVRE, Juges assesseurs

- 2/2 -

Vu la décision sur opposition du 25 février 2014, Vu le recours du 18 mars 2014 portant principalement sur une facture médicale de CHF 88,30, Vu la réponse du 17 avril 2014, Vu la convocation à l'audience de comparution personnelle des parties du 23 juin 2014; Attendu qu'à la réception de la convocation la recourante a indiqué qu'elle renonçait à son opposition, et par conséquent, retirait son recours; Qu'il convient d'en prendre acte et de rayer la cause du rôle.

PAR CES MOTIFS, LA CHAMBRE DES ASSURANCES SOCIALES :

1. Prend acte du retrait du recours.

2. Raye la cause du rôle.

La greffière La Présidente :

Brigitte BABEL Francine PAYOT ZEN- RUFFINEN

Une copie conforme du présent arrêt est notifiée aux parties par le greffe le

A/852/2014