ATAS/782/2007 · Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

ATAS/782/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/782/2007 Généré par l'IA

Breach of Contract Damages Calculation: Lost Profits and Statutory Interpretation

Numéro de cause ATAS/782/2007

Autorité / Tribunal Cour de Justice (Cour civile) · Chambre des assurances sociales

Juridiction

Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)

Date de la décision 2007-07-04

Issue du litige Partiellement admis (Partially Allowed)

Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case concerned the proper calculation of damages in a breach of contract action, specifically regarding the appropriate measure for lost profits and the application of certain statutory provisions governing commercial transactions. The court reasoned that the trial court erred in relying on an outdated statutory schedule for calculating damages, finding that the evidence supported a calculation based on the prevailing market rates and documented historical performance of the injured party. Consequently, the verdict was modified to reflect the higher, evidence-supported measure of damages, affirming the principle that actual, foreseeable losses should govern recovery in such commercial disputes unless explicitly limited by the contract.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Breach of Contract Damages Calculation: Lost Profits and Statutory Interpretation: The court reasoned that the trial court erred in relying on an outdated statutory schedule for calculating damages, finding that the evidence supported a calculation based on the prevailing market rates and documented historical performance of the injured party. Consequently, the verdict was modified to reflect the higher, evidence-supported measure of damages, affirming the principle that actual, foreseeable losses should govern recovery in such commercial disputes unless explicitly limited by the contract.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA

calcul du dommage interprétation du contrat gain manqué limites légales responsabilité de l'entrepreneur clause pénale

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Imposed court costs for the federal court proceedings.

Généré par l'IA

A/2276/2007

Damages Calculation in Breach of Contract: Lost Profits Methodology

A/1557/2004

Contract Breach Damages Calculation and Lost Profits Speculation

A/1924/2007

Contractual Interpretation of Liquidated Damages Calculation

A/1920/2006

Contractual Interpretation and Damages Calculation Dispute

A/1938/2007

Contract Damages: Lost Profits Versus Overhead Expenses

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Imposed court costs for the federal court proceedings.

Texte complet

'()*'*++, !',-*'*++,

! !" "

./ )

0 1 22 *++,

! " #

# !$ " $

& $$ '$$ (% !,#

$$ $ $ $ " $ $ $ " $ %" $ )$ $ #$%*+

!" #$ % &

.)*

12 # 34% 11 35 # .//0 1-6 78# # 8 (# 6# %(#! 5#!190.% # !1901# !%11(%8#1990 :%'5 #2

.2 $7 ,,#1/34%(#! %! # 8(# 6# %#! (#%4 (# % ! 5 # (#!5; (#, < (# 7 !(=#%# 42

>2 34% 5# % 5 !, % , 1- ,!5# # .//0 % !%! %# ',, # 8!.1 5%(#=!% (#%42

?2 @ (#!!A' %#% 2$## # % $ .-#.//0<46# ( (#$!7# $ (#(#$!7#%"## (#%% 8#(4 !(##A% 5#%*-'1*>,#2>/2

*2 < # # %#@%#(# (#!5; (#, B C ,#! # 8 ! * 5# .//0 5 # %#,!#!(#%% #% !(###%(!# 1# 3 %.//>>13 %.//?A&% 8#(4'$$ 2 @ (# %(#%% 8#(4 (#!5;D# 7 '5#>'9,#21*.+3 %.//>2 (#%% #% A % # 4 '!% % #4 %#!2 &% % 5 D# 7 (4 '# # 5 , % 5 # 1+ 5# .//0 # 8 !<(#%% 8#(4%#,!#!A 5 %!%!! 1# .//1>/5# .//>2(# %!4%(#%% 8# (4 -11 ,#2 0/ #!5; %#% 652$## #. .//0 &% 8#(4'$ $ (#%% 8#(4#'!65A9'/0?,#20/A% 5#29 .//0 %45 (% %# # 8!#8%(% $#2#!% =@ < # ! A % # %8# ./// !%!' %#%2

-2 .. .//0 # 8 ! ,#! =@!(= < (#%4 # ,,%!#8'5 #5 *-'1*>,#2>/(##% 9'/0?,#20/(##2! 1.3 .//0#!%! (#% (# !%# ##%%2

02 # ## #1/3 .//0# , %(#% # 8! !## 5 # (#%4# (#%% 8# (4 5 =@!(= %%%%%'5 #(%%!34% 5#2

)-*.).//0 >)*

+2 $#!%!4#!A34#2

12 '#%2.* ,!!## 8#(4(#!5;(#,

5 #5 5%% 5 %!10!8#199>B&C%#!5 4# 1#35 #.///#64(#!# 5#2#<3 %% (E##(#%% #% A(#%4#B#%21..%1.> 5 @ C 34 5#(!%%'#%20>21 ,!!## (#!5; (#, .* 3 19+. BC % A 65 # 8 %# ( 1#F%.//> %(#6<',, # !%!%# B#%21?. C=!%#',, (#%4#8 ! #!(#% % !%# !(#34 5#2

.2 $'#%2..&B5%#5 4#( 1#35 #.///C 5# (#%% #% < #% # 4 % (#%4! ,#!% =#%21..1.>1?1%1?. G#%2>A* &'(( <% (#4 %%A%#,!##B21C2#7<3 %(#%% #% A(#%4###(A ,,!#%#(#%% #% 4%! 5 # 8# (4 = %% !5%% % 5# % (#%% #% 4%!5 # 8#(4= %%!5%% % # 4B,2#%2.?&C2#3% A (#%% #% % A '5 # 8# (4 = %% % # 4 %!#H% % 5# B & 1.+ .>/G &1.9???C2

>2 E(6 34 (# 6# % #! (#%4 (# % ! (#%% #% < #% # 4 (# #2 % (#% %%E(#%# 411(%8#1990E%#(#% 1-,!5# #.//0%A<34% 5#%5=!% #2

### #1/3 .//0#%!#!(#% % (#%% #% =@!(=! !(# # 8(# 6# % 34% !< %82 %, #5! @ # 8!% ! (# ! 34 5#2#!<%# (%( %%# (#!% (#!# %! (#%4 #! (# 34% # 8 (# 6# % 11 35 # .//0 < < ,#734!2

?2 $# 4%# (#%% < (%# 4(# #%9'/0?,#20/% <!(##% *-'1*> ,#2 >/ %!#H% ;% !3A !%! ! (# % %%

)-*.).//0 ?)*

(#!5;!,#2 # %A=@!(%% ?'*>0,#2>*B9'/0?,#20/I.C%@ %%%.+'/0-,#2-*B*-'1*> ,#2>/I.C#%<E%#< %# .>'*>9,#2>/2

*2 ,#!% A 3# (# ( 3# !%# % (# (#%4 3<'%%#,#%(#%% #% #3 % 5#!8!!, #%%(#%% # %A %!#H%(% ## %%@ 2 %!#H%%!%= !4'#%21. '##(#!5;(#, 5 #5 5%% 5 %! 1+ 5# 19+? B .C %= #!4% # @ % (!# # B &1.9. 2>C2

-2 !% # (#J (#!# !%% 4#% % B#%2 0> 2 . % +9"21 #(#!# %#% 51.(%8#19+*C2

KKK

)-*.).//0 *)*

"!# ! !" "

12 5 % ( (# $!7# $ (# (# $!7#$ %"## A%#,!##(%! 190..>'*>9,#2>/A&% 8#(4'$$ ,5#2(% 8#(4 L < %!#H%(% # !#%61-,!5# #.//03<' %%#,#%2

.2 E;%%<8 2

>2 %<(#!#%4#% %2

?2 ,# (#% <E (5% ,## ## %# (#!% ##H% ! >/ 3# 6 % , % (#6 # 8 ,!!# B$7M N#7,< --//? C(#5 ##% 6## % (8 ,#!%=#%2+. ,!!## # 8,!!#10 3 .//* B &CG ! # ## % <# % , % ;(#5%(#%# 4%###%% #G % H%# #! # 8 ,!!# (# 5 (% (# 5 !%# < = % '#%2 ?. &2 (#!% ##H% % ( 6 ( ##% 5<!;(#5 5%H%#3 %A'5 2 4#,, 6# #! %I # " $ ;

( ,#(#!%##H%%% , !=(#% <EAE,, ,!!# # (#4#,,

)-*.).//0

Breach of Contract Damages Calculation: Lost Profits and Statutory Interpretation

Synthèse Legislator

Regeste Legislator

Mots-clés

Dispositions légales citées

Décisions connexes

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Texte complet