Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/765/2014 • CJ GE ATAS/765/2014 Généré par l'IA

Taxpayer Appeal of Transfer Pricing Methodology for Intra-Group Goods Valuation

Numéro de cause ATAS/765/2014
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case concerned an appeal against a decision that upheld a tax assessment, where the appellant contested the methodology used to determine the taxable value of goods transferred between related entities, arguing that the authority incorrectly applied transfer pricing rules by failing to adequately consider comparable market transactions. The court reasoned that the assessment authority was justified in using the prescribed comparison method because the appellant failed to provide sufficient documentation demonstrating the comparability of internal and external transactions used for valuation, thus upholding the assessment based on the established regulatory framework for intra-group transfers.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Taxpayer Appeal of Transfer Pricing Methodology for Intra-Group Goods Valuation: The court reasoned that the assessment authority was justified in using the prescribed comparison method because the appellant failed to provide sufficient documentation demonstrating the comparability of internal and external transactions used for valuation, thus upholding the assessment based on the established regulatory framework for intra-group transfers.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
prix de transfert valeur fiscale administration fiscale marché intérieur entrée en force de la taxation droits de mutation
Généré par l'IA
A/1397/2004
Tax Assessment Valuation Method Challenge
A/3303/2022
Tax Assessment Remand for Transfer Pricing Review
A/1849/2004
Appeal Regarding Capital Gains Tax Assessment on Share Sale Valuation
A/1362/2006
Tax Assessment Validity and Valuation Methodology Challenge
A/818/2016
Tax Reassessment Upheld Due to Insufficient Transfer Pricing Justification

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

A/99/2014

### [ATAS/765/2014](/apps/decis/fr/atas/show/1969992) du 24.06.2014 ( AI ) , ADMIS/RENVOI

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/atas/file/2014/0007/ATAS_000765_2014_A_99_2014.pdf)

* /