Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/75/2008 • CJ GE ATAS/75/2008 Généré par l'IA

Prior Consistent Statements Admissibility Upon Claimed Memory Loss

Numéro de cause ATAS/75/2008
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case concerns a challenge to the admission of prior statements by a witness who claimed memory loss regarding the events described in those statements, specifically whether the witness's assertion of current inability to recall rendered the prior consistent statements admissible to rebut a defense suggestion of improper influence or fabrication. The court determined that when a witness testifies to a present lack of memory, prior consistent statements are admissible to rehabilitate the witness by demonstrating that they did recall the events when the statements were made, thereby rebutting the inference that the testimony was recently fabricated or the result of improper suggestion, even if the prior statements were made after the alleged improper influence began, provided they predate the alleged fabrication.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF, Art. 68 al. 2 LTF; Prior Consistent Statements Admissibility Upon Claimed Memory Loss: The court determined that when a witness testifies to a present lack of memory, prior consistent statements are admissible to rehabilitate the witness by demonstrating that they did recall the events when the statements were made, thereby rebutting the inference that the testimony was recently fabricated or the result of improper suggestion, even if the prior statements were made after the alleged improper influence began, provided they predate the alleged fabrication.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
témoignage demande en justice preuve à futur inexploitabilité des preuves illicites preuve insuffisante d'aggravation médicale preuve de la vérité

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This article is cited in the dispositive regarding the decision on costs for the appeal proceedings.

Art. 68 al. 2 LTF

This article is cited in the dispositive concerning the setting of the court fees.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



             !"

##$

%& #'&( )( %$ &#)$ )($

)*+,  -  . /0 " 



 !"#  $ % "&' ' (#'!!")#'!!*'   +, -







'

++   )       '"# !./0  





          

   $513$  



  6'  !# ! )66 ' ! )$(!'# ! /'7 5440 '8'!9:34("7544;<

   ! / ("7 5440 !    &#'# &  (' !#&#&=! 7'!8)'! !#&#'#<

!#!)66'!)$(!'#!2:(544>' !/'75440<

''!!'-)'?@3?3 :-)8)(!&#(8)''# !   ) &' !#  !# ' -    #'# 6"#?

 ' '    )&=  )'"# .' #  !# 'A  2:( 544><

)('!)&!' !!#7:''!.! B<

)!"'#!0@46?#'8CA!)'"#?



1232415440  $313$  

# )$ 1 ($ #'&( )( %$ &#)$ )($



9? #7:'?

5? .!B?

3? !")'"#8&.'!"'#!0@46?

2? 6"  &' !  -D &(' 6"  '  &#' E' !  !# ! 34 : !=  '6' &= ! 7 6#!# FCGHC6-; ;442  I &(!"'=!!' &7 6"#"' J '? >5  !   6#!#   7 6#!# ! 90:544@F +I<"#"!!'!- "'6' ".!&('&'A'!'!"!'<!' E' !#  7 6#!# & ( &'  & ( #'- J !' ! )'? 25  +?  &#' E' '  &=  & ! ' (-#""".!&( !('E':'8)(?

 A66=  #!'M       + K L #    &6"!&#'E'''6#J&'&A66







1232415440