Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/74/2008 • CJ GE ATAS/74/2008 Généré par l'IA

Statute Regulation of Hazardous Materials Upheld Against Vagueness and Overbreadth Challenge

Numéro de cause ATAS/74/2008
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A party sought to enjoin the enforcement of a statute regulating the storage and handling of hazardous materials, asserting the law was unconstitutionally vague and overbroad as applied to their operations, which involved storing a substantial quantity of regulated material, differing from other facilities in volume and configuration. The court held that the statute's requirements, particularly regarding separation distances and facility design, were sufficiently clear and provided adequate notice of prohibited conduct, rejecting the vagueness challenge, and determined that the statute's broad scope was a legitimate exercise of the police power to protect public safety concerning dangerous substances, thereby denying injunctive relief.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Statute Regulation of Hazardous Materials Upheld Against Vagueness and Overbreadth Challenge: The court held that the statute's requirements, particularly regarding separation distances and facility design, were sufficiently clear and provided adequate notice of prohibited conduct, rejecting the vagueness challenge, and determined that the statute's broad scope was a legitimate exercise of the police power to protect public safety concerning dangerous substances, thereby denying injunctive relief.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
substances dangereuses exécution exercice de prérogatives de puissance publique menace pour la sécurité publique protection de la possession puissance protectrice

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
The court orders the appellant to pay the costs of the federal procedure.
Généré par l'IA
A/3832/2006
Regulations Upheld Against Vagueness and Overbreadth Challenges
A/1637/2003
Statutory Validity and Vagueness Challenge
A/3120/2006
Statutory Vagueness Challenge to Regulatory Statute
A/893/2004
Statute and Regulation Challenge Based on Free Speech and Due Process
A/1465/2003
Statutory Interpretation and Constitutional Challenge to Regulatory Statute

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court orders the appellant to pay the costs of the federal procedure.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



             !

""#

$% "&%' (' $# %"(# ('#

()*+  ,  - ./ ! 



   ! "#  $ %%&



&%

''   (   !#%)  & ! *%  +, "" )- 



           

   "1.1"   !  %44 & 51&6%1223(77 &(4 8 " 4%9: ;%*&&(44 & 55* &1223,

%%" 02&6%1223%!<( &&% 4% "  % 6!3)6%1223,

%!4( -!6%1223,

%% %%%&12!6%1223+= &%& %% %%,

&&+( ) &4%%&%&% &%%&%>%%? 8%&@AB5 ;B



" (# 0 '# "&%' (' $# %"(# ('#

5B %&%&% &%%,

1B >%?,

0B  &+4%!%&C%& &,

/B 7%  4%&    +D 4)& 7%% %% &%  4%!& %%E&   !   02 *% 9  & 7 &  4%9  % 6 7!!% 8#=F G%=7+ --22/  ;4%) %%& 9%% & 46 7%!& H %&B @1      7!!% %  % 6 7!!%  53* 122I8 ';,! %%% &  +% & 7& >4%)&4%&% C&%%%&& %,  & E&% %!  % 6 7!!% 4% )  4&  4% )  !&% + H  &   (%&B /1  'B  4%!& %%E& &  4 9  4   %%& )+!>4%) )&E&%* &<() B  C%77 9%  %! &       '%# J K !%       

 4  7%  4%!& %%E& & & 7 ! H 4%&     +D #%!&% & (&&<(! 4%C%77



./011.1223