Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/727/2014 • CJ GE ATAS/727/2014 Généré par l'IA

Appeal Regarding Rejection Based on Untimely Procedural Submissions

Numéro de cause ATAS/727/2014
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appellate court reviewed a decision concerning the rejection of a claim, where the core issue involved the proper application of procedural rules regarding the submission of evidence and argumentation. The court upheld the lower tribunal's decision, reasoning that the appellant failed to adhere to the mandatory deadlines and formats stipulated for presenting new facts and legal arguments during the appeal process, thus justifying the lower court's refusal to consider the untimely submissions.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 93 LTF, Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Appeal Regarding Rejection Based on Untimely Procedural Submissions: The court upheld the lower tribunal's decision, reasoning that the appellant failed to adhere to the mandatory deadlines and formats stipulated for presenting new facts and legal arguments during the appeal process, thus justifying the lower court's refusal to consider the untimely submissions.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
contrôle de la procédure nouveau moyen de droit lois de police forclusion pour tardiveté recours contre décision de renvoi procédure préjudicielle d'urgence

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 93 LTF
The appeal was rejected because it did not meet the requirements for admissibility concerning an appeal against a non-final decision.
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
The appellant was ordered to pay the court costs.
Généré par l'IA
P/9797/2023
Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Written Submission
AC/477/2015
Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Filing
PM/1122/2016
Appeal Dismissed Due to Untimely Filing and Lack of Good Faith
P/9454/2023
Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Untimely Filing
A/3140/2013
Untimely Appeal Due to Late Filing and Procedural Deficiencies

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 93 LTF

The appeal was rejected because it did not meet the requirements for admissibility concerning an appeal against a non-final decision.

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The appellant was ordered to pay the court costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

A/891/2014

### [ATAS/727/2014](/apps/decis/fr/atas/show/1969961) du 17.06.2014 ( CHOMAG ) , REJETE

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/atas/file/2014/0007/ATAS_000727_2014_A_891_2014.pdf)

* /