Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/720/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/720/2007 Généré par l'IA

Contractual Guarantee Validity and Damage Calculation Appeal

Numéro de cause ATAS/720/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The initial appeal concerned a dispute over a contractual obligation, where the appellant sought to reverse a judgment predicated on the trial court's application of a specific statutory provision regarding the enforceability of a guarantee agreement. The court reasoned that the evidence supported the finding that the statutory requirements for the guarantee's validity were met, specifically referencing established precedents concerning the necessary element of consideration as reflected in the underlying transaction documents. A subsequent appellate action addressed a related claim regarding the calculation of damages, where the court affirmed the lower court's use of a particular market valuation method, finding it consistent with the contract terms and prevailing industry standards for assessing the loss suffered by the non-breaching party.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Contractual Guarantee Validity and Damage Calculation Appeal: The court reasoned that the evidence supported the finding that the statutory requirements for the guarantee's validity were met, specifically referencing established precedents concerning the necessary element of consideration as reflected in the underlying transaction documents. A subsequent appellate action addressed a related claim regarding the calculation of damages, where the court affirmed the lower court's use of a particular market valuation method, finding it consistent with the contract terms and prevailing industry standards for assessing the loss suffered by the non-breaching party.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
validité du contrat calcul du dommage notion de décision accords particuliers différend commercial clause de garantie d'effectivité

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
The provision is cited for ordering the appellant to pay the costs of the federal court proceedings.
Généré par l'IA
A/1920/2006
Contractual Interpretation and Damages Calculation Dispute
A/2440/2004
Contract Interpretation and Damages Calculation Appeal
A/93/2005
Contract Interpretation and Damages Calculation Dispute Affirmed
C/10827/2004
Contract Interpretation and Damages Appeal
A/2056/2004
Contract Termination and Damages Calculation Dispute

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The provision is cited for ordering the appellant to pay the costs of the federal court proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

           '()*+'*,,- !'.*,'*,,.

!

 ! !"    " 

/0 +  *, 1  *,,. 



 !"  ! 

 !# !" !$%& "%  !'"%   

%

(    )    )  !%% "7  !$% *$+$%,--./ 0

(    )    )  + "+)! &  1"2%33443 ) 

    5 '36  

            !" #$  %   &

  98,  

 #!

3<  =+!%  9. $%!* 944;  .>! 1!*  *  $!> %  $"  &   !  "  3?:: % "3?:3!" % :=3??.<

9< )177. =+!%$"%" * $!>% " $%+$!%" & $"&@$7!"$ % !+$ ! <

-<  =+!%  & % & "7%7  -3 %* 944; %  "%" %! '77 * "94&!*944;$A"% $%+<

,< &%+%  * "%$! %%5 !  $$> ( %%%%$$"%& +"+  )!  '$%% %5$ %!+ 3;'4-37< 7!"!% B 'A B  %%  3? 7"& 9446  %% 7 %<   ! %*""7 '$%% *$+ 39'4:37< 34  !!%  '%"  7  & $>  %% !C! 7 % !%% !$% *$+B/1 ;! 9446 #<$%% %!"!!% !+'">&B ,'?-. 7< ;4 &  %"C%  =5' !!%  &    -4!9446 %% >7 %<

:< -&%.!9446 * "!!5"AA#"$A 5*$%+77%"<

;< 9:!9446 ! %! * " "   !$%  * $+<  '% "+!% "" '  &   '& %&% $% A#"$A%5$$" $ * "<

6< )"%"+ "B=+<

 "!

3< '%<9: 7" "*$+ $"&@$7 &&&%%& %" 36 "!*3??-D(E%"&+ 3=&9444>+$"   &<5=%% $ F $%% %B$%+D%<399%39-   &# E =+   &!$"%% '%<6-<3 7" " $"&@ $7  9: = 3?.9 DE % B >&  *

    8,-9:8944; -8,  

%  $3G%944- %$>5'77  "%"%!D%<3,9 EA"% '77$%+*  "  "$%% "%!"$=+  &<

9< )'%<99(D&%&+ $3=&9444E  &  $%%  % 5 %  !+ % $%+" 7!"!% A%<39939-3,3%3,9 H%<-B: ('$$5% $+!%%B%7"D<3E<15=%$%%  %B$%+$ B 77"%$%% %+!%"  &  * $+ A%% "&%!%  !!%  & %  $%% %+!%" & *$+A%%"&%!% !!%  !+D7<%<9,(E<=% B  $%%  % % B '&  * $+ A%%  !!%     !+  %"C%   !!%  & D ( 39.  9-4H (39?,,,E<

 F$>  =+  $!> %   "  $%+ $ !%"  $%%  % 5 %  !+ $  ! <  % $%% % F $%   !+  : = 3??. F% $%  -3%*944; %B5=+!%  &% &A"%<

-< )  7!%   !  $  !!%  & '$%% % '%% 9.'4.97<34D3;'4-37<I39'4:37<E<% & &&%  " 5!!% !+ ' !%%  ,'?-. 7<  5  %"C%  =5'B '%"  7  &< !  $ '$%% %!"$ % !+ 9-'3,,7<34<  %BA#"$!! 33':697<4: 7<D9-'3,,7<347<J9E<

,< 7!"!% B  =$  $  = "%!% $  $%+ =5'!!% %7% $%% %  !=% &"*""7 %%$%% %B %"C%!$% !%% #< %"C%%"%A!!!"+'%<39 ' $"&@$7&&&%%& %"  3. & 3?., D 9E    %A "+!%  # % $" D ($*"-;849 3.=%944-E<

:<  "!!%   $K  $"  "%% +%% D%< 6- < 9  % .?0<3 $"  !%%& 39$%!*3?.:E<



LLL

    8,-9:8944; ,8,  

  "!#  ! !"    " 

3< &%(    )    )  +"+   ) !  B %7"  !$%    $"&@ $7 M 3?.;99?844443  !!  33':69 7< 4: B      !$% *$+M  7&   !   5  %"C% !$%    "% >-3%*944;=5'!!% %7%<

9< F@ !%%5 *<

-< %5$" %+%%<

,< 7!  $%   5F $&% 7!  %  $"% C%   "  -4 = >  %7% $>  * 7" " D)1NO175;;44,  E$& !%>  % $*7!"!%A%<.9 7" " *7" " 36 = 944: D (EH  !"!   %  5   !%7 % !@ $&%$%+% % ! %H % C%  "  * 7" " $ & $%  $ & "%5 A  %  '%< ,9  (<  $"% C% %  $>  $  %&5"!!!@ $& &%C%=%B'&<  +77>  " %J          0  ) @   

$7! $"%C%%%7"A$%5FBF777" " $+77

    8,-9:8944;