Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/687/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/687/2007 Généré par l'IA

Restrictive Covenant Enforceability Dispute

Numéro de cause ATAS/687/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case concerned a dispute over the enforceability of a restrictive covenant concerning the use of certain property, specifically challenging whether the covenant was properly executed and whether subsequent conduct invalidated its enforcement. The court determined that the covenant was validly established based on the instruments presented and that the alleged modifications or waivers did not sufficiently demonstrate abandonment or invalidation of the restriction, concluding that the covenant remained in effect and enforceable against the current property holder.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Restrictive Covenant Enforceability Dispute: The court determined that the covenant was validly established based on the instruments presented and that the alleged modifications or waivers did not sufficiently demonstrate abandonment or invalidation of the restriction, concluding that the covenant remained in effect and enforceable against the current property holder.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
exécution restrictions par effet contrat possessoire objet du litige titre exécutoire de mainlevée servitude de restriction de bâtir

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Applied to order the appellant to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Généré par l'IA
A/179/2006
Restrictive Covenant Enforcement Dispute
A/2172/2004
Covenant Enforcement Validity Dispute
A/2383/2006
Restrictive Covenant Interpretation and Enforcement
A/228/2004
Restrictive Covenant Enforcement Despite Neighborhood Change
A/683/2004
Enforcement of Restrictive Covenants Against Commercial Use

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Applied to order the appellant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

           #$%&#'%%( )#*$(#'%%(

)

 )  )    

+  '

" ,& -" '%%( 



 !"#$#% &'"("' ( )*    



(

++   , ))      (!" -./0 '(1$2#$## #%



                   !"   "

   6$3%6  

))  . )

 ' "  $2 78 $55/ ,++     , )) 6     96':  ;  (<" =   96':  (;'"("''((7 >?  @  < (('((0

  ,(((( '( <A(      "(" (B"  ! ( ( ( $C78$55/0

( "'' $4<"8$55/D'7 ( #!$55/0

 "' #$8$55/,(!"(=,8B(" '  ( 8("0

,8(" =  "(!   >(  ( E'> ' "(  / ! $55/86!F!D " ( %578$55/(8(" ! ((= ('""!(<>'"" (8( >" ''8GA '"  0

'' $%!$55/,  >"!(0

 ' '  $. ! $55/  '( ( "(" <!" >   "(( A " = 7A>( 8B("H

 /)   )

 B "(!'"((!(:92CH#(HGH$;0

 "''('8(<,B7( ,':  B  "   %5 7 > 8(  (<( 9(H C5    <" "   '(A""  ( 6': ;0

' "<E"''('F('A""8  <!7( (((  " ,!'FG!( ,A9<H(#C  '"  !((866': ;0

  " !!( =    !   !!( ( E'( >,(!B(!  !G7"A!(<""'!7 (8(9(#/ ;0

, ,':  "  "(" (<"  ! (  (  (  $C 78$55/ (> "'( $/788(="G" !G$2 <"8("(( :'(" $C<"8$55/0



345.3$55/  6%3%6    ,(    "(" '("  (  $4 <"8 $55/  >  (  (( ,'0

 ' ">(   ( 8B '   ( 8("  ( ,"A( <!7!(< ,!'FG!(0

,  8( , '  > ,!'FG(  ( = (!'  8 ! (H

  ) .  )  )    

"

#H "8B' ( 8("H

$H =''( ,"!!(H

%H <!  '(   >I '8( <!  (  '"( F(   "  %5 7 :  (<( ':  B <" " 9)GJKG<>CC551  ;'8 !(:  ( 'B<!"!(E(H4$ <" " B<" " #/ 7 $552 9 +;0  !"!   (  >   !(< ( !- '8('(A( ( ! (0 ( F(  "  B <" " ' 8 '(  ' 8 "(> E  (  ,(H 1$  +H  '"( F( (  ':  '  (8>"!!!- '8 8(F(7(=,8H  A<<L  '" (L         ) B)   

'<! '"(F(((<"E'(>I=I<<<" " 'A<<





345.3$55/