Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/686/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/686/2007 Généré par l'IA

Law of the Case Doctrine and Interlocutory Modification of Judgment

Numéro de cause ATAS/686/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The court considered whether a ruling regarding an earlier set of findings and conclusions, which modified a judgment in part, precluded the party from raising certain issues regarding the original judgment in a subsequent appeal, particularly concerning the application of a specific legal standard to the admitted facts. The court reasoned that because the earlier ruling was an interlocutory modification that did not address all the issues currently being appealed, and the issues raised in the current appeal were not fully decided or waived in the prior proceedings, the party was not barred by the law of the case doctrine from challenging the specific aspects of the original judgment related to the legal standard applied to the established factual record.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Law of the Case Doctrine and Interlocutory Modification of Judgment: The court reasoned that because the earlier ruling was an interlocutory modification that did not address all the issues currently being appealed, and the issues raised in the current appeal were not fully decided or waived in the prior proceedings, the party was not barred by the law of the case doctrine from challenging the specific aspects of the original judgment related to the legal standard applied to the established factual record.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
doctrine juridique recevabilité du recours incident aspects juridiques révision d'une décision effets des arrêts préjudiciels obligation de poser des questions

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision was cited in the dispositive regarding the allocation of court costs.
Généré par l'IA
C/2082/2021
Appealability of Interlocutory Evidentiary Rulings
A/2333/2007
Preclusion Doctrines and Prior Judgments
C/20742/2021
Appeal Regarding Interlocutory Evidentiary Rulings Admissibility
A/3146/2006
Statute of Limitations and Law of the Case Doctrine
A/2046/2003
Issue Preclusion in Prior Litigation

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision was cited in the dispositive regarding the allocation of court costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

           #$%&#&''( )#$*$#&''(

 )

 )  )+     +  

,  &  -. / &''( 



  !"#$$%&  ' & ( 

(

&&  &    &  &)*!(((+,(+#-. '#/ (!" 011   0 && /    23 4,(+$-#$## #.



                 ! "   

   /$5./  

  "  ( (8" 9 :  ;/,<  (= , 011     0 && /    ;/,<  =  $$ >?$%%3

    $% 8"? $%%3 , @  ( !  @   ( "A!"((@?B8(!(

  ",  0   $. ! $%%3  "(   !! C!,<(!(!,")BD((@0,( (

 0,,       !,( (!" ,    $6 ? $%%7

A,(8,/(, #3?$%%3

(( @0(@( ("(""9?  8( @  ",  "(" !  B""8 0 ( 0? (" (<   ?(," ,((E ?

    B  (  #2 ? $%%3  8A(  " ,  @0((( 03!$%%3

(( @(0,"E  "8A"

0 ?(  (( @    !,(  " (( A,( (( ((@A,(0(,!"  ((( ,( (

0?( 0, (( 4 F"(( ? B>(:







56+%5$%%7  /.5./  

   +) 1  )  )+     +   

#: ((@( ?B>(:

$: 4 F:

.: 8!,( @G,?(8!(,"(H(   "  .% > <  (8( ,<  B 8" " ;&)IJ)8@77%%+  =,? !(<  ( ,B8!"!(A(:6$ 8" " B8" " #3 > $%%- ; 1=K  !"!   (  @   !(8 ( !4 ,?(,(E( ( ! (K ( H(  "  B 8" " , ? ,(  , ? "(@ A  ( 0(:+$ 1:,"(H((,<, ( ?@"!!!4 ,? ?(H(>(90?:



 E88  " (L             & B& 





,8! ,"(H(((8"A,(,E88



56+%5$%%7