Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/652/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/652/2007 Généré par l'IA

Late Disclosure Justifies Exception to Timely Objection Rule

Numéro de cause ATAS/652/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appellate court considered whether a party's procedural failure to timely object to evidence, as required by court rules, should be excused when the opposing party failed to provide adequate notice of the evidence, specifically by failing to disclose a critical report until the day of trial. The court reasoned that although the general rule requires timely objection to preserve error, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the evidence because the late disclosure by the opposing party fundamentally impaired the objecting party's ability to prepare an effective response, justifying the exception to the strict adherence to the procedural rule.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Late Disclosure Justifies Exception to Timely Objection Rule: The court reasoned that although the general rule requires timely objection to preserve error, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the evidence because the late disclosure by the opposing party fundamentally impaired the objecting party's ability to prepare an effective response, justifying the exception to the strict adherence to the procedural rule.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
exceptions procédurales tardives défaut de preuve production tardive de pièces règles procédurales obligation de renseigner violation du principe de célérité

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision was cited in the dispositive section regarding the imposition of court costs.
Généré par l'IA
A/3162/2006
Appeal on Exclusion of Evidence for Untimely Discovery Disclosure
A/4667/2005
Appeal Regarding Timeliness of Opposition and Admissibility of Evidence
A/1926/2004
Late Witness Disclosure and Abuse of Discretion
C/18039/2015
Appeal Inadmissibility for Late Evidentiary Submissions
A/2063/2006
Non-Compliance with Procedural Deadlines and Mutual Violations

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision was cited in the dispositive section regarding the imposition of court costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

           !"#$!%&&" !'(%!%&&"



)* +,*  ) *   +

-./ (  ' 0 %&&" 



   !  ""#





#"

$$   % && '   " # ! ()* 



              

   '.+-'  



  1  #"0#!.12!3" ".//*""#" !  "44 # %22 #%"' 3  #!.,03 ".//* # 4  ##5#   6%5%#" %"#%" "#4"2 % 4#7

% # !!!  ##""4"!  .. .//*## %88#54"!"5 #"# 4!# "# 2 #54"" 3!  7

    06%5%3 4"!3 5%#" #!""%"" 4#" !""!  "44 # #"6""!#!2"! 9#"%"#:;-:- 2!!""4"# 8!!""  1#<".///= >7

% # !%!# #4"!#" !"4"!#"""6% ! !  ##6!"#6% !# #"" #" !""" 4"!"7

"?""#5%# !  " 44 # .,03 ".//* 3 # !""6% # !2 #" #5 7

  +  +,*  ) *   +



@: "#%# !  "44 # ##"":

.: !"""<0#:

-: ("A:

,:  #64"!"#8"# #:



+*,-+.//*  '-+-'   ;: 2"4"# 6B43#2""""#"4"!#""C#   !   -/ 0" D  # 2 #  4"D  " < 2!!" =&EF G"E26  1 1//,   > 4"  3   ""  # D"  " # 4< 2"!# 9 "#: H.      2!!" "  " < 2!!"  @* 0  .//; = $>7  ! "  ""  #  6"   # 2#(4"3#4"#" 8#"""# # "7  #C#""! " <2!!"4"3 4#4" 3 !#" 69 # %"#:,. $:4"!#""C##4 D  4   ""# 36!  (  4"3  3# C#" 0 #5%3 :   8"22 D"  "! #J          " I  & (       



4 2"4"!#""C### 2 !94"# 4"8"22





+*,-+.//*