Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/643/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/643/2007 Généré par l'IA

Exclusion of Unauthenticated Written Evidence Regarding Oral Contract Modifications

Numéro de cause ATAS/643/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appeal concerned a challenge to the exclusion of certain evidence regarding a contract breach, where the lower court had permitted testimony about the contract's oral modifications but excluded written documentation offered by the opposing party that allegedly supported those modifications. The court held that the exclusion of the written evidence was not an abuse of discretion because the party offering it failed to establish a proper foundation showing that the writings were directly authenticated or directly related to the specific oral modifications testified to by the witness, thus rendering the evidence irrelevant to the central dispute.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Exclusion of Unauthenticated Written Evidence Regarding Oral Contract Modifications: The court held that the exclusion of the written evidence was not an abuse of discretion because the party offering it failed to establish a proper foundation showing that the writings were directly authenticated or directly related to the specific oral modifications testified to by the witness, thus rendering the evidence irrelevant to the central dispute.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
récusation de témoin moyens de preuve sans pertinence partie au contrat dépositions des parties inexploitabilité des preuves illicites usage de faux

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision was cited in the dispositive to rule on the allocation of court costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

            !"## $%%" & "!' $%%(

&

 & ) )&)  )  

*  $  + , $%%( 



  !"# $!%!%% . &'() *+*,- "'.$#.!!" /#.!!0.

.

  11   1  1   ."# . .! &2)3 '. *+ (

                   

   %+4+%  

  !# ! .. .7#  .  ++ " +66( '   11    1   1    ''.   !#  ''.!*,$"8+66( .!*3!#"8+66(9

 ':!./!!"'.'!'.!;" +66<9

..! =/> ..   !#  #.# 7-# >   '  !#."   ''. .. >   !# .? . >  ! > $ > /. ! . !/ '. . ! ""8 ! /& !/. '.   . '..==/.!!"!!!#'9

 '  ! +* " +66<     7"#   !# ! ...?9

.=8..?!!.>!!#'>..!'.'.> 7.>-!$.9

 8!#7-!#'7.!"8!/#. !/! .!/.!/..9

//': !#'.7-#>7@*/+)67@

---

  .& /  & ) )&)  )  

*@ .>!=!#!..!++"+66( =!#''.!*,$"8+66(.#@

+@ !"$".7$!.!/!".#! */+)67@>..!!#'@  ?77A  '#!.         1 81

'7"!'#.2...7#-'.'?77

43(554+66(