Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/64/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/64/2007 Généré par l'IA

Privilege Protection for Internal Governmental Legal Advice and Deliberative Process Documents

Numéro de cause ATAS/64/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case concerns the proper application of the statutory privilege protecting certain internal communications from discovery, which was contested when a party sought documents related to the drafting of a particular regulation. The court reasoned that the privilege applies to internal communications made for the purpose of providing legal advice or formulating legal positions in anticipation of litigation or in the course of official governmental functions, and, based on the evidence of the purpose and context of the communications, it determined which specific documents were shielded from production, distinguishing between those integral to the deliberative process and those serving a purely factual or administrative role.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Privilege Protection for Internal Governmental Legal Advice and Deliberative Process Documents: The court reasoned that the privilege applies to internal communications made for the purpose of providing legal advice or formulating legal positions in anticipation of litigation or in the course of official governmental functions, and, based on the evidence of the purpose and context of the communications, it determined which specific documents were shielded from production, distinguishing between those integral to the deliberative process and those serving a purely factual or administrative role.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
avis juridiques production de pièces protection des communications protection du processus décisionnel projet d'ordonnance égalité dans la loi

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court ordered the appellant to pay the costs of the federal judicial proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



                ! "

# #$

% !&'% $!#  %$ #$&

$()*   +  ,- "         !"#$!"%&' &    &    ((     )     !" &#$ +,-.      &  "#( !"#$    //$ 



    

   %504%  

+  . /+  !$3,81!&"&!$&$/$ )&&$/&"/&"#( & 9

)&:$$;")&/#/&&""'$#+"/56659

2/&#:5662!"#( ;#$)((      )   %  <%/= >?).#/&"3&:5662! ; $"& @  &  / A      * * %  (* * *B   *   *< * >9

 / "$ " 3 @#: 5662! ) ! & /          *    * !$.)$& /#/&&")#&&":$9

5,@#:5662! ;#$//&!//&?) )$&&/")"@/C&"&;")&&&9

/"$"53@#:5667!) C&$)//&9

 &C&$46@#:56679?)"#".  ?  : " $  / #&   ?& "  ": '&/"$#/&&&/&"&/$ )&&$/&C&""A/&9

"$/"35C@566-!) &C&"9



$      ? ;#$#& . D&E 27 "    D'& C"<>! :&"&#/$&&/&& "/$&9

).&")&E-3"/$""#&&@"35/&#:3,82 < >!)&&$/&!");;?F&!")//"&"& &&C"?&/&:")F&;;&$/)"/$"E! ?=&"&&:'&"/&&"$"@&//:9

))/=!&&C"?""#( /&F&;;&$/ )"/$&/$"9

)C&;/$?&")//9



0123405667  %404%  



 $ 0#!&1  !&'% $!#  %$ #$&

+ 2 2   )

3E //"#( E

5E #/&&"$ .-  "/"$&#E

4E &?"&."/&';;/&&E      $"&H ';;=      I    %  G

/;#"/$&"&&;$A/&/';;





0123405667