Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/569/2004 • CJ GE ATAS/569/2004 Généré par l'IA

Retroactive Statute Challenged on Due Process and Contract Grounds

Numéro de cause ATAS/569/2004
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A dispute arose concerning whether a statute requiring payment for services rendered prior to the law's enactment, even for continuing obligations, was an unconstitutional retroactive application violating due process or impairing contracts. The court reasoned that the statute served a legitimate public purpose by addressing an existing problem and that the retroactive application was not unduly harsh or oppressive given the nature of the continuing obligation and the public benefit achieved, thus upholding the statute against the constitutional challenges.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Retroactive Statute Challenged on Due Process and Contract Grounds: The court reasoned that the statute served a legitimate public purpose by addressing an existing problem and that the retroactive application was not unduly harsh or oppressive given the nature of the continuing obligation and the public benefit achieved, thus upholding the statute against the constitutional challenges.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
indu obligation de conclure prestation de droit public prestations fournies versement continu des prestations législation rétroactive

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision was cited to regulate the costs of the proceedings concerning the appeal.
Généré par l'IA
A/2735/2006
Property Rights Challenge to Retroactive Statute
A/253/2005
Statute Retroactivity in Enforcement Actions
A/3612/2007
Tax Statute Retroactivity Challenge
A/1561/2003
Contract Interpretation and Retroactive Amendment Application
A/1406/2004
Statutory Assessment Retroactivity and Due Process Challenge

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision was cited to regulate the costs of the proceedings concerning the appeal.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

               "#$%"$&"'"( ")*+"'$$&

,,

- , .-( (  -,  (

'/  01    2%  '$$& 



3   -  -(  ( ! !)!* "#$%#&'(



#$*

45555555555 ,( !+,!*



            !

   20-2  

  !)!  )&+ 3#*$$ *  #)) ! ./ ,*  *$& ( ! ,*& !)&&$*$&,4

+*&$*!3*$&$3&5!#&*4

6!&!#)3*$&#3*#!3*$&!78&$0//14 6#*!&$*$*3*$&($$#&#9#!$&#3$$3#* #!!$#$#)3$#))!.,* :!+,!*3$!3'*   

  -./-0//1  2-2  

,   3 ( , .-( (  -,  (

 600   7

809   :  7   6! 2*' (;<

; #$( 9 <   <  !##*!( :)#$$!=#&$&)&$+(.,* 

0 6'#!)$$:!>#& 

 #$(?@@@@@@@@@@< !#AA)$(3'*$$#)) 

1 6'#!)$$:!>#& 

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

  -./-0//1