Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/563/2004 • CJ GE ATAS/563/2004 Généré par l'IA

Statutory Interpretation of Pre-1890 Rights

Numéro de cause ATAS/563/2004
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A legal dispute arose concerning rights established under earlier enactments from 1883, 1889, and subsequent periods, specifically regarding the interpretation and application of those statutory provisions. The court reasoned that the earlier rights were not abrogated or superseded by the later statutes, concluding that the rights stemming from the foundational 1883 act remained enforceable alongside the later established rights, thereby affirming the continued vitality of the initial claims.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 93 BGG, Art. 66 al. 1 BGG; Statutory Interpretation of Pre-1890 Rights: The court reasoned that the earlier rights were not abrogated or superseded by the later statutes, concluding that the rights stemming from the foundational 1883 act remained enforceable alongside the later established rights, thereby affirming the continued vitality of the initial claims.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
droit acquis interprétation des lois droit de demeurer constitution d'un droit réel droit de préemption légal droit inaliénable et imprescriptible

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 93 BGG
The appeal is dismissed because the appellant failed to submit the substantive ground for annulment within the required time limit.
Art. 66 al. 1 BGG
The appellant is ordered to pay the costs of the federal proceedings.
Généré par l'IA
A/3169/2007
Statutory Interpretation Dispute
A/1773/2002
Statutory Interpretation of Property Rights and Liability
A/2512/2004
Statutory Interpretation of Property Rights
A/357/2005
Historical Land Rights Interpretation and Application
A/165/2005
Historical Land Rights Interpretation and Application

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 93 BGG

The appeal is dismissed because the appellant failed to submit the substantive ground for annulment within the required time limit.

Art. 66 al. 1 BGG

The appellant is ordered to pay the costs of the federal proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

%&'(&  !  ) 

&  "&!

    

 

            ! "##$

  *#

%&'(" )))))))))) * + +  *   ,# *# #-#    *

*

 *  % # #  .   /

            !  "#$

 

0 123 0



#  * 4    ! # #*  # 53 6 7 1883 *4  +# , 1889  +  ,#* 7   4 : $ &;;;;;;;;;;  *7 1883 <

#  * # ++ # 5=  1889 <

#  *#  $ &;;;;;;;;;; # 5. 6 1889 <

#     #+  ,  # 9  1889 <

#  *# # 5. ># 1889 # *# +  #+  *# <

# -#,  >#4  #+ ,#* # + *#  ,$ =? $     #  +*#  6 # 51 + 7 5@?. AB <

(#, ++*  ,$ =@  ,#*  + + * *   +  +#  # ,44* +  7#  * : ,*C* ,#  : * + # >#   * #* #D + # + E$  +++

0 323 0

 , % - .        / $$ '$/ 01&'2&3'$4#"(5&("$"&'$'("$&"#6$7 89 

5$ #+ ,#*   *#  ++*  ,$ =? $  $

1$  -# ,#*  + + * *   +  +#  # ,44* +  7#  * : ,*C* ,#  : * + # >#   * #* #D + # + E$

3$ 6  #   +*#$

9$ 4   +  * -#, +#6 4  *# *  + E  #   58 ># F  4* + + *   # 7# 4  #* *CGHC4-# I I889 &!   D +$    +# E +$     B -# D*  -# *  *#  7  #  +*   * -#< 7B D+ +# -# 4    +#6   * # *< *B +  # # *   +$      *     #  #  B 7B  *B *0#  7# 4  #*  +# +   F #  *# -#, 6 * *67$     *#  *  /  +#6 -#  >  -#  * -#  ,6++  -#    D+ # *# A$ 531 58I  58? "B$

 44F  

*/ '  

& *+ *4  # + E  4 #D +  -#,: ,44* 4  #* * +  44