Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/561/2006 • CJ GE ATAS/561/2006 Généré par l'IA

Easement by Implication of Necessity for Landlocked Parcel Following Severance

Numéro de cause ATAS/561/2006
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Partiellement admis (Partially Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The litigant challenged a judgment that determined their right to an easement, arguing that the trial court misinterpreted controlling precedent regarding the necessity of an easement for a landlocked parcel, particularly in light of circumstances arising from a prior conveyance. The appellate court reasoned that the prior grant of the disputed strip of land, which severed access to a public way, demonstrated a clear intention to reserve an easement by implication of necessity because the remaining parcel was rendered landlocked, and the law favors not rendering property useless, thereby affirming the finding that the easement existed based on the necessity created at the time of the severance.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 106 al. 1 LTF, Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Easement by Implication of Necessity for Landlocked Parcel Following Severance: The appellate court reasoned that the prior grant of the disputed strip of land, which severed access to a public way, demonstrated a clear intention to reserve an easement by implication of necessity because the remaining parcel was rendered landlocked, and the law favors not rendering property useless, thereby affirming the finding that the easement existed based on the necessity created at the time of the severance.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
servitude droit foncier allocation de départ droit de visite détournement d'objets sous main de justice droit de reprise de la possession

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 106 al. 1 LTF
Used in order 1 to declare the appeal inadmissible as it concerns a final decision not reviewable under the standard procedure.
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Imposed costs upon the appellant in order 4.
Généré par l'IA
A/2774/2005
Easement by Necessity and Timing of Severance
A/1445/2002
Easement Validity Dispute Affirmed
A/288/2007
Easement Obstruction Dispute
A/2445/2006
Easement Obstruction Dispute
A/31/2004
Property Dispute Over Prescriptive Easement

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 106 al. 1 LTF

Used in order 1 to declare the appeal inadmissible as it concerns a final decision not reviewable under the standard procedure.

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Imposed costs upon the appellant in order 4.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



               #$%%#&''% #(%)#&''%



 *+ ++  *+  

,  &  &' ! &''% 



   -..........  

)  / -..........  ! "#  $ %&!%'(!))*(!)+

! 

0 - * /1  21   3%,!+  - ./0%122/   )(8)  4++ ++  5-  )! !) !)- .%!/304%32//56 7

                 !"

  /9:  

+ 4

4+   ;.! ) 4: )(-  /22:%  /< 7-  ) - )  < 

/+ ,788 42!44);.! (!(% -) < !  )( !. !()& ) (&? 8*  7)(@) ! .+ ;.!8! (8( A&!  (@+

B+  ;.! ) )&  ! )& )(8!8  B4 ;&  /220 !  (!( !  )'88 -)(>8(&  /220 @(!) !.+

1+  -)(!() !) !!!) (&?% ! (!!!)(8)  !)*  !!)& ) !*) ! .%!! 41&  4>31!B4;& /220+

:+ ,  )'C     )4: /220% !!) !

* .(!!+

! !!((7*)4//220+

0+  )43/220% -'!* <)&!) !  ! )  &!% *  (!(  )!+  )!  ! 8 ( *  !!))) )&!D!  !.(%)) '?! !(+

E+ )!!(!(! @ !)!)B2/220+; )!  )*(*'A)(8!)'- &!)'4:;/220% D! ! )  !!-+

. - !((7* )/01':048 +8!)()  !! ) />'B>1 8 +% &  * &!   . ! !( )  &!+

  (*!   !! * )!   .   " 

8@!!!&)(@ !/2;/220 )'(&! - &!+

    91009/220 B9:  

>+ '-)'-;!))(8@(%(!(. )(A;. +

+ *

4+ ' !+/:)8()(  - .) (&? 8% &% &&!!&)!()4E)(- 4>>BFGH%! (&.  4 ;& /222% <. () ))& + *;!! )I )  !!) !A !. F !+4//!4/B ) &J H% ;.)))& (!!)' !+EB+4)8()(    (&?  8 ) /: ; 4>3/ FH% ! A <&  - !) )4 K!/22B%)!% <*'88   (!(! F !+41/ H%@(! )'88 !. -) () ( !!)(! ( ;.))& +

/+ ,' !+//GF&! &. )4 ;& /222H% ) )& %   !! )  ! * ) !   . !  !.( 8 (! @ !+4//%4/B%414!41/ L !+BA: G'*!  .!!A! 8(  F+4H+ 7*;!% !!)  !A !.  )A)88( !  !!) !%.!( ) &  ) -  . @!! (&!!  ! ) )& % !   !!) !%.!()& )- .@!!(&!! !)) .F8+ !+/1GH+ %;! A   !! )  ! ! A '&  ) -  . @!!  ! )   )  .  !( D! )  ! ) )&  F G 4/3  /B2L G4/>111H+

 I<%  ;. )  <  !   )(   !.   !( )  !! )  ! * ) !   .    )) +  )!  !! !% )I  !%  )  .%  41 &  4>31% )I!   !  B4 ;& /220%)!A*;.!))& !)&@(! +

B+ ,  )!  )!%   !! * )!   .  

!( ) !!)!) () .%!( D!?!)(;A (!( (   '!!! )  (&? )(8) +  '! " 

8 +M/H

1+ 8 (! A  ;  )% )  ;  )(! !     !. ;*'!)! 8 !) !!) !)) %;! )& (-((8 )!! !!) !A)!( D!!   !!)J+ !( D!!(!@(.' !+4/

    91009/220 19:  

)' )  (&? 8&% &&!!&)!( ) 43 &  4>31 F /H    !@ (.! %  J ! (   F G-(B092/)43;!/22BH

:+  (!     N%   ()  (!! . !! F !+ EB + /  ! 3>C+4)  () )! !&)4/!- 4>3:H+



OOO



    91009/220 :9:  

*  4  *+ ++  *+  



61/7/   8  9// /  :" )%& ;

4+ &!  G  ,    ,    56 7 A &   

  ) 44E':3: 8 + :2 A  G  ,    ,   56 78& )")%*)!( D!!  ))( !%)<B4;& /220;*'!)! 8 !+

B I?)!!*)-+

1 !* () !. !!+

: 8    ! )  *' &! 8     !    (!  D! )  )( ) B2 ;  )<  !8!    )( ) (  - 8()(  )  % ,7PQ 78* 0% 0221   %  !  @ +  )(  ! D!   .(+  (  )! M H )*  @!! * )(   ! )(  -!    !  )  )(!!*(L-H@  *!8!& )) !! ! )(LH ! .! )  (!!+,(   !!   !  ((! (( (  !!  H -H ! H J)%  -8()( )  !  !<    *' )& )(   &-+( )  !  ? )  &% *  ! ;!%  *  )( !!*( ! '& ) *(!(@()(  !F !+4B/%420!423H+   88    ()!M       , -, 

8 ) (! D!!!8(@ !*IAI888()(  )  . 88

    91009/220