Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/524/2004 • CJ GE ATAS/524/2004 Généré par l'IA

Assignment of Future Earnings Validity Dispute

Numéro de cause ATAS/524/2004
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The situation involved a dispute over whether certain rights had been validly transferred, specifically concerning the right to future earnings related to an existing agreement. The court reasoned that the transfer in question was an attempted assignment of future earnings that were not yet fixed or ascertainable, and therefore failed under the relevant legal principles governing such assignments. The court concluded that because the purported transfer was of something that did not yet exist as a definable right, it could not operate as a valid present assignment, leading to the determination that the claimed rights had not been effectively transferred.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Assignment of Future Earnings Validity Dispute: The court reasoned that the transfer in question was an attempted assignment of future earnings that were not yet fixed or ascertainable, and therefore failed under the relevant legal principles governing such assignments. The court concluded that because the purported transfer was of something that did not yet exist as a definable right, it could not operate as a valid present assignment, leading to the determination that the claimed rights had not been effectively transferred.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
validité de cession de créance créance future cession de salaire transfert de patrimoine droits et obligations précontractuels fixation du revenu sans invalidité

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court ordered the appellant to pay the costs of the federal proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

               #$$%#&''( #)&(#&''(

!!

* !+* ,  *! ,+

 - " &''( ./  01 2 



   3333333333 



 

4,+,  !5,6 * !+ , !+ )*  4! 789  !"#$#%##&'(



                ! "

   0%+(0  

  *1  2 ! 1  %- '1 %../$ 3 4444444444  11  15  6   1!   15 1211 '1  ) ) ) !  1  !1$  7 1  !)'8  )1  179 :

!1#/1%../$ 1&11 )! )1)! (.;1%../:

!1#/;1%../$1*) 15)26 '1 ) )')* 261 &< !! !)=:

61'1 &!  1  8>:



  +,,-+%../  0(+(0  

!  ,+4  !+* ,  *! ,+



70:   ;  <   => -%& ,9

#?   1 :

%? 8>?         "1&@  )1 @   177 A19 A       



!1*!) B   1*1)C! 11126D61*)) 1!"

  +,,-+%../