Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/51/2008 • CJ GE ATAS/51/2008 Généré par l'IA

Disability Benefits Denial Appeal

Numéro de cause ATAS/51/2008
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Partiellement admis (Partially Allowed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The petitioner challenged a ruling that upheld a determination denying them certain benefits, arguing that the evidence presented did not support the denial of benefits for the specified periods. The court reasoned that the relevant statutory provisions required the petitioner to demonstrate a qualifying disability by meeting the administrative criteria applicable during the time of their application, and because the administrative findings, supported by substantial evidence, showed the petitioner did not meet those criteria during the relevant years, the denial of benefits was affirmed.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Disability Benefits Denial Appeal: The court reasoned that the relevant statutory provisions required the petitioner to demonstrate a qualifying disability by meeting the administrative criteria applicable during the time of their application, and because the administrative findings, supported by substantial evidence, showed the petitioner did not meet those criteria during the relevant years, the denial of benefits was affirmed.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
prestations d'assurance-invalidité procédure d'action en matière d'assurances sociales qualité pour recourir prestation statutaire évaluation de l'invalidité condition du droit à la prestation d'assurance

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision was cited in the dispositive for ordering the losing party to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



            !"!#$$%  &!#$$'

((

)* (+,*- - - ) *(- +

./  0  !% 1 #$$' 



   !"#$ %&'($ ''( !(   )!(*(' '

('

++     ) ,, -      ' ( ! ./0 

                

   -517-  

 -)* - 2+

 &' !    53 !8' 5669 )::  (  )'- $  (! ; < ('.!"'(( #') $  (!=)   (! 73>(5669?

 &' !   ' && (   54 &(8' 5660 )   : '! (( !  ?

&''' '73(8'5660)'! ('@(!''('((!   ( ( $'('(( #'-"73>(5669?

A $'B(!!&'!  7@$ '566CA ! !  54&(8'5660(&'!'$ ")  ('( &' $!  &'! (=((' #''!(8 ' ($'('($ ::('!('( :D

-+)(- - )(+

 32$8'5665 : ( B$ 'A'B ( @   ' ;<('!$ B'3'>(5667 ( (! ' 8('   (((  (  = (( '  (((  '( $ "    :!!' ' A'- $  (! ; ? :D '(  3 ( ' ( 94  D 3 (  ED 5 <?

&!( ' 8!(#'!(8 ?

 (''A ( !!!  ((=!?

A'(D97D7 :!!''&'( B!!'' ('   ; < A'' &( ' !''  !   ' && (  (' =''(:'!@=A"A$ &'!$ ?

:'(#'(('= ( B$ (8@(?

  ''( =  8( ( B     ' (  '8'(   :'  ( !&  =F( '?

:'!("@' &'(( ' 8:!!'' ''(  ' ( "  !& G '=  &'!' (  8@( &' (( =E#&'#@( : (; +33690 D5? 3/C/ &D73C D58<?

 ( (    A&# # ' = A ( !  : ( ' ( F     ''(D



1234315660  -717-  

(  3 +2  (+,*- - - ) *(- +



3D '(!  53!8'5660A )'!    54 &(8' 5660 ( '$.'   " )  ('(  &' $ !  D

5D !'''8@(D

7D .'HD

2D '$ "A:: (A'- $  (!D

9D  A ( ! " $'' "  ''(    3)666 :'D " ( ('  &'(  &( ":' (!&D

4D ()!(: F!"566:'D"E'B) ( !D

0D  (=&'= (' (F!&&'( &$(:''''(' &'!( ''G(   !   76 @' #  ( : (  &' &  '! '!  ' 8 :!!' ;,EI J'E:=  4 4662   < &'  $   ''  ( #'  ' ( &8 :'!( F '(D C5      :!!'' ' 8:!!'30@ 5669; +<?! ''' (  ='    ( : ( .  &'$ ( &'('   B('  ''(( '?  (G(''! ' 8:!!'&'$  &(&'$ !(' =F ( )'(D25 +D&'!(''G( (  & #  &   ''( $=!  .  &'$  $(G('@ (")$ D  B':: #'  &'! (         ' B ((, % K' ,  K

& :'&'!(''G((( : !F&'(   =A"A:: :!!' ' &'B'::



1234315660