Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/468/2018 • CJ GE ATAS/468/2018 Généré par l'IA

Withdrawal of Appeal in Supplementary Benefits Case

Numéro de cause ATAS/468/2018
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige struck_off
Frais judiciaires sans frais
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appellant filed an appeal against a decision by the supplementary benefits office concerning a matter of supplementary benefits, but during the in-person hearing, the appellant formally withdrew the appeal. The court, citing the relevant procedural law which stipulates that the withdrawal of an appeal terminates the proceedings, took note of the withdrawal, struck the case from the roll, and ruled that no fees would be charged for the procedure.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 100 al. 1 LTF, Art. 64 LTF; Withdrawal of Appeal in Supplementary Benefits Case: The court, citing the relevant procedural law which stipulates that the withdrawal of an appeal terminates the proceedings, took note of the withdrawal, struck the case from the roll, and ruled that no fees would be charged for the procedure.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
prestation complémentaire suppression de la prestation d'assurance retrait de la demande mise à la charge des émoluments renvoi ad separatum qualité pour recourir

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 100 al. 1 LTF
Although not explicitly cited in the dispositive, the withdrawal of the appeal implies that the decision on costs is procedural and typically governed by procedural laws. Given that the procedure is declared free of charge, this provision relating to costs in case of withdrawal is implicitly applied, but since the decision states explicitly that 'no fee is charged' and does not cite a specific procedural cost article like Art. 66 LTF, we rely only on the cited articles. However, since the text cites Art. 89 LPA for the procedure, and the costs section only states 'The procedure is free of charge' followed by order 3, we only list the explicitly cited articles.
Art. 64 LTF
This provision governs legal aid. Since the procedure is declared free of charge (no fee is charged), and no specific article for cost imposition (like Art. 66 LTF) is cited, Art. 64 LTF is not directly applicable as legal aid was not requested or granted, only the absence of fees was noted. Therefore, only Art. 89 LPA is extracted as the decisive provision.
Généré par l'IA
A/2910/2013
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Supplementary Benefits
A/2821/2011
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Supplementary Benefits Ruling
A/3981/2015
Withdrawal of Appeal in Supplementary Benefits Case
A/1086/2013
Withdrawal of Appeal in Supplementary Benefits Case
A/4080/2024
Withdrawal of Appeal in Supplementary Benefits Case

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
art. 89 al. 1 de la loi sur la procédure administrative, du 12 septembre 1985 (LPA ; RS E 5 10)

This provision dictates that the withdrawal of the appeal terminates the procedure, which is the basis for the court's decision to acknowledge the withdrawal and strike the case from the roll.

Art. 100 al. 1 LTF

Although not explicitly cited in the dispositive, the withdrawal of the appeal implies that the decision on costs is procedural and typically governed by procedural laws. Given that the procedure is declared free of charge, this provision relating to costs in case of withdrawal is implicitly applied, but since the decision states explicitly that 'no fee is charged' and does not cite a specific procedural cost article like Art. 66 LTF, we rely only on the cited articles. However, since the text cites Art. 89 LPA for the procedure, and the costs section only states 'The procedure is free of charge' followed by order 3, we only list the explicitly cited articles.

Art. 64 LTF

This provision governs legal aid. Since the procedure is declared free of charge (no fee is charged), and no specific article for cost imposition (like Art. 66 LTF) is cited, Art. 64 LTF is not directly applicable as legal aid was not requested or granted, only the absence of fees was noted. Therefore, only Art. 89 LPA is extracted as the decisive provision.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

A/928/2018

### [ATAS/468/2018](/apps/decis/fr/atas/show/1974360) du 04.06.2018 ( PC ) , RETIRE

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/atas/file/2018/0004/ATAS_000468_2018_A_928_2018.pdf)

rÉpublique et · canton de genÈve

POUVOIR JUDICIAIRE

A/928/2018 ATAS/468/2018 COUR DE JUSTICE Chambre des assurances sociales

Arrêt du 4 juin 2018 6ème Chambre

En la cause

Monsieur A______, domicilié à GENEVE · recourant

contre

SERVICE DES PRESTATIONS COMPLÉMENTAIRES, sis DEAS, Route de Chêne 54 ; case postale 6375, GENEVE · intimé

Vu en fait la décision sur opposition du 2 mars 2018 du Service des prestations complémentaires (ci-après : SPC) ;

Vu le recours du 16 mars 2018 de Monsieur A______ (ci-après : le recourant), interjeté contre ladite décision auprès de la chambre des assurances sociales de la Cour de justice ;

Vu la réponse du 12 avril 2018 du SPC ;

Vu la réplique du 30 mai 2018 du recourant ;

Vu l’audience de comparution personnelle des parties du 28 mai 2018 durant laquelle le recourant a déclaré retirer son recours ;

Attendu en droit que selon l'art. 89 al. 1 de la loi sur la procédure administrative, du 12 septembre 1985 (LPA ; RS E 5 10), le retrait du recours met fin à la procédure ;

Qu'en l'espèce le recours ayant été retiré, il convient d'en prendre acte et de rayer la cause du rôle.

Qu’au surplus, la procédure est gratuite.

PAR CES MOTIFS,

LA CHAMBRE DES ASSURANCES SOCIALES :

Statuant

Au fond :

1. Prend acte du retrait du recours ;![endif]>![if>

2. Raye la cause du rôle ;![endif]>![if>

3. Dit qu'aucun émolument n'est perçu.![endif]>![if>

La greffière Julia BARRY · La présidente Valérie MONTANI

Une copie conforme du présent arrêt est notifiée aux parties par le greffe le