Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/463/2009 • CJ GE ATAS/463/2009 Généré par l'IA

Withdrawal of Appeal Against Disability Insurance Decision

Numéro de cause ATAS/463/2009
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige struck_off
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

An individual, represented by a union, filed an appeal on March 19, 2009, challenging a decision issued by the Cantonal Office of Disability Insurance (OCAI) on February 20, 2009; however, the appellant subsequently sent a letter dated April 7, 2009, expressing the intent to withdraw the appeal, leading the Cantonal Social Insurance Court to formally acknowledge the withdrawal and strike the case from its docket.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Withdrawal of Appeal Against Disability Insurance Decision: An individual, represented by a union, filed an appeal on March 19, 2009, challenging a decision issued by the Cantonal Office of Disability Insurance (OCAI) on February 20, 2009; however, the appellant subsequently sent a letter dated April 7, 2009, expressing the intent to withdraw the appeal, leading the Cantonal Social Insurance Court to formally acknowledge the withdrawal and strike the case from its docket.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
assurance d'invalidité suppression de la prestation d'assurance litige d'assurances sociales nouvelle demande de prestations d'invalidité retrait de la demande remboursement de l'assurance-invalidité

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
The court's decision on costs is usually based on this article, although it is not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders in this specific case where the case was withdrawn, the costs section is the only potential area where this could apply if costs were addressed. However, since the dispositive only orders taking note of withdrawal and striking the case from the roll, and cites no other provisions, the resulting output must strictly reflect only cited provisions.
Généré par l'IA
A/763/2009
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Disability Insurance Decision
A/802/2009
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Disability Insurance Benefits
A/791/2009
Appeal Withdrawal in Disability Insurance Case
A/2782/2016
Withdrawal of Appeal in Disability Insurance Case
A/4578/2018
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Disability Insurance Decision

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court's decision on costs is usually based on this article, although it is not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders in this specific case where the case was withdrawn, the costs section is the only potential area where this could apply if costs were addressed. However, since the dispositive only orders taking note of withdrawal and striking the case from the roll, and cites no other provisions, the resulting output must strictly reflect only cited provisions.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

A/955/2009

### [ATAS/463/2009](/apps/decis/fr/atas/show/1962867) du 24.04.2009 ( AI ) , RETIRE

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/atas/file/2009/0004/ATAS_000463_2009_A_955_2009.pdf)

RÉPUBLIQUE ET CANTON DE GENÈVE

POUVOIR JUDICIAIRE

A/955/2009 ATAS/463/2009 ARRET DU TRIBUNAL CANTONAL DES ASSURANCES SOCIALES

Chambre 3 du 23 avril 2009

En la cause

Monsieur C__________, domicilié à Chêne-Bougeries, CH, représenté par UNIA GENEVE Mme D__________ · recourant

contre

OFFICE CANTONAL DE L'ASSURANCE-INVALIDITE, rue de Lyon 97, case postale 425, 1211 GENEVE 13 · intimé

Vu la décision rendue en date du 20 février 2009 par l’OFFICE CANTONAL DE L’ASSURANCE-INVALIDITÉ (OCAI) à l’encontre de Monsieur C__________,

Vu le recours interjeté par l’intéressé en date du 19 mars 2009,

Vu le courrier adressé par l’assuré au Tribunal de céans en date du 7 avril 2009 indiquant son intention de retirer son recours,

Attendu qu’il convient de prendre acte de ce retrait et de rayer la cause du rôle.

PAR CES MOTIFS,

LE TRIBUNAL CANTONAL DES ASSURANCES SOCIALES :

Prend acte du retrait du recours.

Raye la cause du rôle.

La greffière Yaël BENZ · La Présidente : Karine STECK

Une copie conforme du présent arrêt est notifiée aux parties par le greffe le