Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/429/2006 • CJ GE ATAS/429/2006 Généré par l'IA

Contractual Notice Provisions and Strict Compliance

Numéro de cause ATAS/429/2006
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case involves a dispute concerning the interpretation of a contract's notice provisions, where one party claimed proper notice was provided via certified mail to a specific address, while the opposing party contended that the notice was ineffective due to an outdated or incorrect address listed in the agreement, resulting in a forfeiture or other consequence. The court reasoned that the contractually designated notice method and address must be strictly adhered to for the notice to be legally effective, and since the record showed that the notice was not sent to the precise address stipulated in the governing agreement, the requisite procedural step had not been satisfied, thereby precluding the enforcement of the resulting forfeiture or penalty.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Contractual Notice Provisions and Strict Compliance: The court reasoned that the contractually designated notice method and address must be strictly adhered to for the notice to be legally effective, and since the record showed that the notice was not sent to the precise address stipulated in the governing agreement, the requisite procedural step had not been satisfied, thereby precluding the enforcement of the resulting forfeiture or penalty.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
interprétation du contrat exécution notification des ententes pacte commissoire clause pénale contrat d'enregistrement

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This article was cited to order the appellant to pay the costs of the federal court proceedings.
Généré par l'IA
A/498/2007
Contractual Notice Compliance and Ambiguous Deadline Interpretation
A/2398/2006
Contractual Notice Requirements and Termination Validity
A/1865/2006
Contract Notice Requirement and Timeliness of Suit
A/1578/2007
Improper Notice of Contract Termination
A/2901/2007
Contractual Notice and Procedural Prerequisites Barring Breach Claim

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This article was cited to order the appellant to pay the costs of the federal court proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

                 !

""

# "$#% &%'%  #"%& '&$

&()*    ) ! 



  !  !"#   $%%&'(" %#%- )((* !   + !"%,%$-$,%.!  "  /% -  





#-%

 !  !!  !", ",#-)(*" - $ )) !  





   

   &(02&  

%#%4

5 6#%4

5#% -%7-%,%- 4

" & +'$,  "$#% &%'%  #"%& '&$

  -../   0

1./2/)) 3 -4 ! 5 ' 6

)8 #- 9 !  !!  !#::-9,'% 9 ; !  !#)2<=1)>%8")*6#%",#%# -#-#,-"--- -%,%-- # ?,%-- ##,$- %  8

(8 5'#--?@# 8

28 # - 9  ;   !  !   ?"  #-%,%- "  %#A-57# %,,%$-- #9> %7# %95#-% !  !!  !" --  - -%  ,%-- #   ?  ,%-- # #,$- % 8

18 5'#--?@# 8

38  -?,%#$%-:%- -8

=8 ,, - #5%-83* " >#%,%- ?5,7->#%% %#%#-%,%$-%%B-$ 2*6#%C#- > - #,%,  %#$%$ % @>$$%%"!/D E%/#>? ="=1   "-%# F, %8$ ,-B-%,%##:$8$# %# -G H  ?%F--?$  #%#%-$ %#@- % -, $  #--?$4@HF,#%,#%?#- > - ,#7# %%-- -%$  #4H,#%-% :-%##%,%$--8! $# % #- - ,  -%#  $$- $$%$ # --% H @H - H  &"  % @>$$%%,#%%,-%%- C%%%#%?5  7%$%% %%7@8$# %%#%- #%#%#'



0122)0(3  &202&    ,%7" ?  %#- 6# -"    ?  $  # --?$ - 57#,,  ?$-$F,$ $%#%-I%-8)2(")*=-)*JH8    :%>> %G %$ -G       K        

#, #>#%,%$-%%B--#- > $F,%- ,%:%>>





0122)0(3