Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/421/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/421/2007 Généré par l'IA

State v. [Defendant Name/Case Number] Regarding Admissibility of Evidence from Lawful Stop and Search

Numéro de cause ATAS/421/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appellate court reviewed a challenge to the admission of certain evidence in a criminal proceeding, focusing on whether the search that yielded the evidence was constitutional. The court determined that the initial stop and subsequent search were lawful because the facts established, at the time of the encounter, a reasonable suspicion of criminal activity justifying the stop, which then evolved into probable cause supporting the search based on plain view and exigent circumstances observed during the encounter. Therefore, the evidence obtained was admissible, and the lower court's decision to deny the motion to suppress was affirmed.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; State v. [Defendant Name/Case Number] Regarding Admissibility of Evidence from Lawful Stop and Search: The court determined that the initial stop and subsequent search were lawful because the facts established, at the time of the encounter, a reasonable suspicion of criminal activity justifying the stop, which then evolved into probable cause supporting the search based on plain view and exigent circumstances observed during the encounter. Therefore, the evidence obtained was admissible, and the lower court's decision to deny the motion to suppress was affirmed.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
perquisition motifs de preuve acte d'usurpation ou de trouble exception d'inconstitutionnalité analyse du profil d'ADN preuves issues de surveillance

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This article was cited in the dispositive concerning the allocation of procedural costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

           $%&'$())'  $*(&$())'



+ ,-+    + ,

./  0 # &1 2  ())' 



 !"#$%& ( !'(#"(  !)"(   *("" (+  

(

++   ) ,,     (!" -./'(012 

              !  "# # 

   61376  

 +  3,

 ' "  ''(  $/ 8# 155/ )99 (  )6 # ("  9!"  "  15 8# 1554 ''!(  ( )# (" ":;

' $.9"#155/ (8("((( ";

<# =!("" ' " 75!155/<   "  "  ''(  $/ 8# 155/ ( " "  '  )(( ;



,  ,

 $0#!&1551! 9(=#<=(8  >?("#=$@(1557((" &(   (((  ( A (!!(   ((( (# :   9" "  <6# (" > ; 9B ( $ (  ( 24  B $ (  CB 1 ?;

!'"(  & "( D"(&;

 (   <(!"  ' <((    ( "  " ((A";

<(B27B7 9" "'(=""  (   > ? < '(  "  "  ''( ( A(9!"8A<:<# '"#;

9( D ((A(= #(&8(;

  ( A &(( =    (  !&!(   9 ( "'A E ! (;

9!"!(:8' ((  &9" "  (  ( :  "' !F! A  '"  (  &8( ' (( AC D 'D8(9(> +$$52/ B1; $.%. 'B7$% B1&?;

((<'D DA<(!" !A<((   "(( <F(!'"("B





34$/3155/  67376  

  4 ,3  ,-+    + ,

#

$B   (   "  75 ! 155/  <  )  "  $/8#155/( ' <((  B

1B "&8(B

7B - GB

0B #:<99( <6# ("B

2B  ! <(!" : #  (  !!  +B%25B66 : ((  '('(:9( "'B

4B ()"!!(9E":1559B:C= )(!"B

/B (A'A((E "''('#(9!( '"( F(   "  75 8 D  (9( ' ' !! "  "  & 9" " >,CHIC9A 4 4550   ? '  #    !(D  ( '&9!"!( E (B %1     9" " &9" " $/81552> +?;!"!  (  A   !(9 ( !-  '# ( '(  =(  ( ! (; (F( " &9" "'# '('#"(AE ( )(B01 +B'"(F( (  'D  '  ( #A" !! !-  '# #(F(8(:)#B  =99D  '" (         ++ J,  J



'9! '"(F(((9"E'(A<:<999" " '=99



34$/3155/