Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/416/2016 • CJ GE ATAS/416/2016 Généré par l'IA

Withdrawal of Appeal Following Amicable Settlement

Numéro de cause ATAS/416/2016
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige struck_off
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The claimant appealed a decision by the cantonal disability insurance office that denied him an allowance for an infirm person; however, after the appeal was filed and the opposing party responded, the claimant's counsel informed the court that the parties had reached an amicable settlement, leading the court to formally acknowledge the withdrawal of the appeal and strike the case from the roll.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Withdrawal of Appeal Following Amicable Settlement: The claimant appealed a decision by the cantonal disability insurance office that denied him an allowance for an infirm person; however, after the appeal was filed and the opposing party responded, the claimant's counsel informed the court that the parties had reached an amicable settlement, leading the court to formally acknowledge the withdrawal of the appeal and strike the case from the roll.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
règlement amiable retrait des conclusions civiles assurance d'invalidité désintéressement du créancier retrait de l'opposition suppression des prestations d'assurance

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision is typically used in the context of costs, but since the dispositive only orders to take note of the withdrawal and strike the case from the roll, and no specific cost order is explicitly mentioned or applied in the numbered points 1 and 2, this might not strictly apply based on the strict rule (only include if cited in the dispositive). However, in the absence of explicit costs in the dispositive, and given the context of case closure, if costs were mentioned, they would be cited here. Since the dispositive contains only procedural actions (1 and 2) and no explicit cost ruling, only the procedural articles are extracted.
Généré par l'IA
A/3480/2012
Appeal Withdrawn Due to Settlement in Disability Insurance Dispute
A/852/2022
Appeal Withdrawal Due to Amicable Settlement
A/1765/2009
Withdrawal of Appeal After Settlement Offer
A/1274/2005
Withdrawal of Appeal Following Compensation Settlement
A/2241/2008
Withdrawal of Appeal Following Settlement in Invalidity Insurance Case

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision is typically used in the context of costs, but since the dispositive only orders to take note of the withdrawal and strike the case from the roll, and no specific cost order is explicitly mentioned or applied in the numbered points 1 and 2, this might not strictly apply based on the strict rule (only include if cited in the dispositive). However, in the absence of explicit costs in the dispositive, and given the context of case closure, if costs were mentioned, they would be cited here. Since the dispositive contains only procedural actions (1 and 2) and no explicit cost ruling, only the procedural articles are extracted.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

A/737/2016

### [ATAS/416/2016](/apps/decis/fr/atas/show/1972011) du 23.05.2016 ( AI ) , RETIRE

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/atas/file/2016/0004/ATAS_000416_2016_A_737_2016.pdf)

rÉpublique et · canton de genÈve

POUVOIR JUDICIAIRE

A/737/2016 ATAS/416/2016 COUR DE JUSTICE Chambre des assurances sociales

Arrêt du 23 mai 2016 10ème Chambre

En la cause

Monsieur A______, domicilié à ONEX, comparant avec élection de domicile en l'étude de Maître MEMBREZ François · recourant

contre

OFFICE DE L'ASSURANCE-INVALIDITE DU CANTON DE GENEVE, Service juridique, sis rue des Gares 12, GENÈVE · intimé

Vu la décision de l'Office cantonal de l'assurance-invalidité (ci-après: OAI) du 1er février 2016 refusant une allocation pour impotent à Monsieur A______ (ci-après: le recourant) ;

Vu le recours du 4 mars 2016 ;

Vu la réponse de l'intimé du 29 mars 2016 ;

Vu le courrier du conseil du recourant du 11 mai 2016, indiquant à la chambre de céans qu'un accord amiable ayant été trouvé entre les parties, le recourant retirait son recours ;

Qu'il convient d'en prendre acte et de rayer la cause du rôle.

PAR CES MOTIFS,

LA CHAMBRE DES ASSURANCES SOCIALES :

1. Prend acte du retrait du recours.![endif]>![if>

2. Raye la cause du rôle.![endif]>![if>

La greffière Florence SCHMUTZ · Le président Mario-Dominique TORELLO

Une copie conforme du présent arrêt est notifiée aux parties par le greffe le